This review critically examines how large language models (LLMs) and multimodal large language models (MLLMs) are reshaping the intelligence paradigm of air-ground heterogeneous collaborative systems between 2023 and 2026 and argues that the core of this transformation is a change in how AGCS understand tasks, coordinate heterogeneous agents, and reason in unknown environments.
Abstract
Air-ground collaborative systems (AGCS), in which unmanned aerial vehicles survey from above while ground vehicles navigate the terrain below, can achieve capabilities far beyond those of any single platform when they share perception and coordinate action. AGCS are undergoing a three-stage paradigm shift: from rule- and reinforcement learning-driven programmed execution, through vision–language navigation that introduces a language interface, to MLLM-driven autonomous perception, reasoning, and heterogeneous collaboration. Taking this paradigm shift as its organizing thread, this review critically examines how large language models (LLMs) and multimodal large language models (MLLMs) are reshaping the intelligence paradigm of air-ground heterogeneous collaborative systems between 2023 and 2026. We argue that the core of this transformation is not the substitution of one technical tool for another, but a change in how AGCS understand tasks, coordinate heterogeneous agents, and reason in unknown environments. They are moving from reliance on pre-specified structures toward semantic understanding and autonomous decision-making. Organized around a three-stage framework, the review covers collaborative perception, vision–language navigation (VLN), vision–language–action (VLA) models, multi-agent collaboration, and air-ground heterogeneous MLLM coordination. We analyze the capability boundaries of MLLMs in air-ground settings and outline the key challenges and roadmap from proof-of-concept to generalizable frameworks.
The results indicate that software engineering work practices are chosen opportunistically, adapted and configured to provide value under the constrains imposed by the startup context.
Nicolò Paternoster, Carmine Giardino, M. Unterkalmsteiner et al.· Information and Software Tec...· 394 citations· ⚡54
This state-of-practice investigation was performed using a literature review followed by a multiple-case study approach and presents how inconsistency between managerial strategies and execution can lead to failure by means of a behavioral framework.
Carmine Giardino, Xiaofeng Wang, P. Abrahamsson· International Conference on...· 175 citations· ⚡19
This study conducts a case survey study based on the secondary data of the major pivots happened in 49 software startups, and demonstrates that customer need pivot is the most common among all pivot types.
Sohaib Shahid Bajwa, Xiaofeng Wang, Anh Nguyen-Duc et al.· Empirical Software Engineeri...· 127 citations· ⚡15
It is found that roles of MVPs in startups were not fully aware by entrepreneurs, and entrepreneurs should consider a systematic approach to fully explore the value of MVP, as a multiple facet product (MFP).
Anh Nguyen-Duc, P. Abrahamsson· International Conference on...· 93 citations· ⚡9
It is found that what perceived as biggest challenges by software startups do vary across different life cycle stages, even though its significance decreases when the learning focuses of the startups move from problem to solution and their products mature.
Xiaofeng Wang, Henry Edison, Sohaib Shahid Bajwa et al.· International Conference on...· 62 citations· ⚡6
A comprehensive overview of how enhanced sampling methods are reshaping the field, with a particular focus on the data-driven construction of collective variables, is provided.
Kai Zhu, Enrico Trizio, Jintu Zhang et al.· Chemical Reviews· 58 citations
Related blog posts
MIT News · Artificial Intelligence· news.mit.eduOct 7, 2026
Students in MIT’s Concourse program delve deeply into the human condition, debate challenging questions, and learn to develop judgment about issues that can’t be quantified.
Training AI agents with reinforcement learning can be challenging because their tools, context, and decision-making are managed by complex frameworks. Agent Lightning connects existing agents to RL training, making it easier to improve them without rebuilding them. The post Agent Lightning v1.0: A 3,500-Line Lightweight Agentic RL Framework for Training Agents with Real Harnesses appeared first on Microsoft Research.
MIT News · Artificial Intelligence· news.mit.eduOct 6, 2026