Skip to content
#reinforcement learning Review Open access

From Programmed Execution to Autonomous Reasoning: The LLM-Driven Paradigm Shift in Air-Ground Collaborative Systems

Sep 2026 · Electronics · 0 citations · 36 references
Multimodal Machine Learning Applications

TL;DR

This review critically examines how large language models (LLMs) and multimodal large language models (MLLMs) are reshaping the intelligence paradigm of air-ground heterogeneous collaborative systems between 2023 and 2026 and argues that the core of this transformation is a change in how AGCS understand tasks, coordinate heterogeneous agents, and reason in unknown environments.

Abstract

Air-ground collaborative systems (AGCS), in which unmanned aerial vehicles survey from above while ground vehicles navigate the terrain below, can achieve capabilities far beyond those of any single platform when they share perception and coordinate action. AGCS are undergoing a three-stage paradigm shift: from rule- and reinforcement learning-driven programmed execution, through vision–language navigation that introduces a language interface, to MLLM-driven autonomous perception, reasoning, and heterogeneous collaboration. Taking this paradigm shift as its organizing thread, this review critically examines how large language models (LLMs) and multimodal large language models (MLLMs) are reshaping the intelligence paradigm of air-ground heterogeneous collaborative systems between 2023 and 2026. We argue that the core of this transformation is not the substitution of one technical tool for another, but a change in how AGCS understand tasks, coordinate heterogeneous agents, and reason in unknown environments. They are moving from reliance on pre-specified structures toward semantic understanding and autonomous decision-making. Organized around a three-stage framework, the review covers collaborative perception, vision–language navigation (VLN), vision–language–action (VLA) models, multi-agent collaboration, and air-ground heterogeneous MLLM coordination. We analyze the capability boundaries of MLLMs in air-ground settings and outline the key challenges and roadmap from proof-of-concept to generalizable frameworks.

Read PDF

Similar papers

#machine learning Review Open access Oct 2014

Software development in startup companies: A systematic mapping study

The results indicate that software engineering work practices are chosen opportunistically, adapted and configured to provide value under the constrains imposed by the startup context.

Nicolò Paternoster, Carmine Giardino, M. Unterkalmsteiner et al. · 394 citations · ⚡54
#machine learning Review Open access Jun 2014

Why Early-Stage Software Startups Fail: A Behavioral Framework

This state-of-practice investigation was performed using a literature review followed by a multiple-case study approach and presents how inconsistency between managerial strategies and execution can lead to failure by means of a behavioral framework.

Carmine Giardino, Xiaofeng Wang, P. Abrahamsson · 175 citations · ⚡19
#machine learning Review Open access Oct 2016

“Failures” to be celebrated: an analysis of major pivots of software startups

This study conducts a case survey study based on the secondary data of the major pivots happened in 49 software startups, and demonstrates that customer need pivot is the most common among all pivot types.

Sohaib Shahid Bajwa, Xiaofeng Wang, Anh Nguyen-Duc et al. · 127 citations · ⚡15
#machine learning Review Open access May 2016

Key Challenges in Software Startups Across Life Cycle Stages

It is found that what perceived as biggest challenges by software startups do vary across different life cycle stages, even though its significance decreases when the learning focuses of the startups move from problem to solution and their products mature.

Xiaofeng Wang, Henry Edison, Sohaib Shahid Bajwa et al. · 62 citations · ⚡6

Related blog posts

MIT News · Artificial Intelligence Oct 7, 2026

Discovering the value of humanistic inquiry

Students in MIT’s Concourse program delve deeply into the human condition, debate challenging questions, and learn to develop judgment about issues that can’t be quantified.

Microsoft Research Blog Oct 7, 2026

Agent Lightning v1.0: A 3,500-Line Lightweight Agentic RL Framework for Training Agents with Real Harnesses

Training AI agents with reinforcement learning can be challenging because their tools, context, and decision-making are managed by complex frameworks. Agent Lightning connects existing agents to RL training, making it easier to improve them without rebuilding them. The post Agent Lightning v1.0: A 3,500-Line Lightweight Agentic RL Framework for Training Agents with Real Harnesses appeared first on Microsoft Research.

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.