Skip to content
Review

From Code to Collaboration: A Cognitive Agent Framework for Large Language Model (LLM)-Based Human-Vehicle Teaming

Sep 2026 · Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting · 0 citations · 10 references

TL;DR

The findings suggest that LLMs are most effective as high-level cognitive partners integrated with verified task-specific modules rather than as standalone controllers in human-vehicle teaming in automated driving.

Abstract

This study develops a human-centered cognitive-agent framework for understanding how large language models (LLMs) can support human-vehicle teaming in automated driving. Following PRISMA guidelines, we reviewed 1,126 records published between 2021 and 2025 and included 52 studies after screening and full-text assessment. The synthesis identified four recurring capability clusters: perception and awareness, reasoning and decision-making, action and control, and interaction and communication. Across these functions, LLMs show promise for improving semantic scene understanding, explainable decision-making, high-level planning, and bidirectional communication with drivers. However, hallucinations, incomplete physical grounding, non-deterministic reasoning, and latency remain important limitations in safety-critical settings. The findings suggest that LLMs are most effective as high-level cognitive partners integrated with verified task-specific modules rather than as standalone controllers. The proposed framework offers design guidance for safer, more transparent, and collaborative human-vehicle systems.

View source

Similar papers

#reinforcement learning Review Open access Sep 2026

From Programmed Execution to Autonomous Reasoning: The LLM-Driven Paradigm Shift in Air-Ground Collaborative Systems

This review critically examines how large language models (LLMs) and multimodal large language models (MLLMs) are reshaping the intelligence paradigm of air-ground heterogeneous collaborative systems between 2023 and 2026 and argues that the core of this transformation is a change in how AGCS understand tasks, coordina...

Zhao-Hui Wang, Yi-Ming Nie, Yan-Xu Hong et al. · 0 citations
#artificial intelligence Preprint Oct 2026

Agentic Cognitive Depth: Operational Criteria for Evaluating LLM Agents

Agentic large language model (LLM) systems are commonly implemented as an LLM in a loop with Planning, Memory, Tools, and Control Flow. This application-focused view connects agentic LLM research with deployable systems and leaves open how such systems should be evaluated beyond end-to-end task success. Building on thi...

Nijesh Upreti, Chris Sypherd, Vaishak Belle · 0 citations
Review Open access Oct 2026

A critical assessment of the rise of agentic AI, its capabilities, task domains and open challenges

The tremendous advancement in Large Language Models (LLMs) has triggered a fundamental reorientation in AI: from basic, single-prompt-based systems to agentic systems that can perceive the world, break down problems into multiple steps, use external tools, and continuously revise the generated response through a long-r...

R. U. Khan, Hanan Aljuaid, Zhang Ning · 0 citations
#artificial intelligence Preprint Sep 2026

Bridging Thought and Action: Taming Long-Horizon Instability in Open-Source LLM Agents with a MetaTool-Enhanced ROS Framework

An enhanced ROS-Agent based architecture that improves task reliability and execution efficiency for agentic robotic systems using open-source LLMs and introduces a novel intermediate mechanism, termed the MetaTool, which enforces structured planning prior to action execution.

Kazi Abrar Mahmud, Nilotpaul Kundu Dhurubo, Tamal Kirttonia et al. · 0 citations
Review Aug 2026

MUSE: An Interactive Meta-Agent for Understanding and Steering LLM-powered Data Science Systems

MUSE is presented, an interactive meta-agent that enhances user understanding and control of agentic data science systems by dynamically restructuring low-level execution traces into multiple semantic levels that support navigation from high-level overviews to low-level implementation details.

Wei-Hao Chen, Weixi Tong, Yuan Tian et al. · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.