Aug 2026· Nature Genetics· Vol 58, pp. 2371 - 2380· 0 citations· 55 references
Medicine
Abstract
Despite great progress on case–control polygenic prediction, an unmet need remains for a method that genetically distinguishes clinically related disorders (e.g., schizophrenia (SCZ) versus bipolar disorder (BIP) versus major depressive disorder (MDD) versus controls). We introduce differential diagnosis–polygenic risk score (DDx-PRS), which jointly estimates the posterior probabilities of each diagnostic category (e.g., SCZ = 50%, BIP = 25%, MDD = 15%, control = 10%) by modeling variance–covariance structure across disorders, leveraging case–control polygenic risk scores and prior clinical probabilities for each diagnostic category. We applied DDx-PRS to Psychiatric Genomics Consortium SCZ, BIP, MDD and control data, including summary-level training data from three case–control genome-wide association studies (n = 41,917–173,140 cases; total n = 1,048,683) and held-out test data from different cohorts with equal numbers for each diagnostic category (total n = 11,460). DDx-PRS was well calibrated and well powered (consistent with simulations) and produced comparable results to methods that require tuning data. True diagnosis probabilities in the top deciles of predicted diagnosis probabilities were considerably larger than prior baseline probabilities, implying appreciable potential for clinical utility in certain settings. Differential diagnosis–polygenic risk score (DDx-PRS) is a method to distinguish related psychiatric disorders from each other and from controls by modeling the variance–covariance structure of disorder liabilities and polygenic risk scores.
BACKGROUND
Polygenic scores (PGS) have been used to quantify genetic liability for psychiatric disorders, but it remains unclear how these scores are associated with age- and gender-specific risk of diagnosis.
AIMS
To examine associations between disorder-specific PGS and age- and gender-specific risk of psychiatric...
Genona T. Maseras, Dan-Ni Chen, C. Albiñana et al.· The British journal of psych...· 0 citations
Bipolar disorder’s genetic architecture appears hierarchical—a general liability resolving into dimensions of course and comorbidity, beyond subtypes, beyond subtypes.
Tracey van der Veen, M. Tesfaye, J. M. K. Yang et al.· Research Square· 0 citations
It is demonstrated that the relationship between alcohol use and psychiatric disorders is driven by a complex, shared genetic architecture rather than environmental complications alone and underscores the value of multi-ancestry and cross-disorder genetic studies in SUD.
O. Andreassen, R. Icick, E. Wistrom et al.· International Journal of Neu...· 0 citations
Abstract Background Genetic and environmental factors, and psychiatric traits, contribute to risk for alcohol use disorder (AUD) and other substance use disorders (SUDs) and traits. Weighing the importance of the different kinds of contribution to risk is important in understanding risk prediction – which may be import...
P. Na, J. Deak, D. Levey et al.· International Journal of Neu...· 0 citations
Correlating deep clinical assessments, genomic variations, and phenotypes at various levels may help to understand the biological links related to disease mechanisms in psychiatry.
B. Viswanath, P. Jayasankar, S. Nayok et al.· International Journal of Neu...· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.