Jul 2026· International Journal on Biological Sciences· Vol 22, pp. 6539 - 6581· 0 citations· 320 references
Medicine
TL;DR
A comprehensive review of delivery modalities of CRISPR systems solely in vivo that underpin their therapeutic translation and outlines the remaining barriers to durable, tissue-selective, and broadly deployable CRISPR therapeutics is provided.
Abstract
CRISPR-based genome and epigenome editing technologies have rapidly evolved from programmable nucleases into a diverse therapeutic toolbox encompassing conventional CRISPR systems, base editing, prime editing, RNA targeting, and epigenetic modulation. While early clinical successes relied on ex vivo manipulation of patient-derived cells, recent advances in delivery chemistry and vector engineering are enabling direct in vivo editing across multiple organs. Here, we provide a comprehensive review of delivery modalities of CRISPR systems solely in vivo that underpin their therapeutic translation. We examine how anatomical, cellular, and immunological constraints shape organ-specific editing strategies in different organ systems and we highlight key preclinical and clinical milestones that define the current translational landscape. Across indications, delivery remains a critical determinant of efficacy, safety, and scalability, governing editor exposure, tissue selectivity, and risk of unintended genomic or epigenomic perturbation. This review, authored by members of the COST Action Genome Editing to treat Human Diseases (GenE-HumDi) Network, delineates the principles guiding in vivo genome and epigenome editing and outlines the remaining barriers to durable, tissue-selective, and broadly deployable CRISPR therapeutics.
A novel genome-wide CRISPR screening strategy that will facilitate the systematic engineering of novel nonviral genome editing delivery methods, where the identified novel gene hits can be further used to increase editing efficiency for other therapeutically relevant cell types.
Shivani Saxena, Meha Kabra, Amr A. Abdeen et al.· bioRxiv· 2 citations
To systematically map cellular factors constraining nonviral genome editing, influencing uptake and intracellular trafficking, we develop a genome-wide CRISPR screening platform linking perturbation of 19,114 genes to editing outcomes in human cells. We identify six negative regulators of delivery whose depletion incre...
Shivani Saxena, Meha Kabra, Amr A. Abdeen et al.· Nature Communications· 0 citations
CRISPR has progressed from an experimental genome-engineering technology to a clinically relevant therapeutic platform, although its future impact will depend on the ability to combine molecular precision and durable therapeutic benefit with rigorous safety assessment, responsible governance, and equitable access acros...
Gabriel Alejandro Ortega Moreno, Gerardo Amaya Villagran, A. González et al.· International science journa...· 0 citations
This review focuses on analytical and translational frameworks for CRISPR fidelity assessment, with emphasis on the strengths and limitations of current bioanalytical platforms.
Arpita Mukherjee· Journal of Rare Diseases· 1 citation
CRISPR has emerged as a next-generation gene-editing tool with the potential to target the molecular pathways associated with ageing and related disorders. It functions through RNA-guided Cas nucleases, directing DNA cleavage and utilizing the native DNA repair machinery for genetic manipulations. Advances in CRISPR te...
Sakshi Rathore, Akash Gupta, Kamal Shah et al.· Ageing Research Reviews· 0 citations
The evolution of clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats-based epigenome editing technologies is summarized, highlighting key improvements in effector modules and underscores the potential of epigenome editing as a versatile platform for precision medicine.
Insung Choi, Sueon Kim, Inwha Baek· Cellular and Molecular Life...· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.