Skip to content

functional-standard-atlas: attenuation-corrected, territory-resolved benchmarking of variant effect predictors against saturation genome editing

Sep 2026 · 3 citations

Abstract

functional-standard-atlas: attenuation-corrected, territory-resolved benchmarking of variant effect predictors against saturation genome editing Software and frozen data underlying the manuscript "Measurement reliability bounds functional benchmarks and relocates where variant effect prediction fails" (N. Zhang). WHAT CHANGED IN THIS VERSIONThis release adds a cross-paper operating-point comparison (Supplementary Note S15, generated by the new lr_basis_check analysis). It reports the four splice and coding likelihood ratios quoted in Fig. 6B on two bases — at the scanned 95%-specificity threshold this study uses, and interpolated to exactly 95% specificity, the basis of the companion splice-region study — together with the full 69-cell comparison. No Fig. 6B value, evidence band, existing supplementary number, figure, or other reported result changes; the frozen atlas and all analyses are unchanged. CONTENTS- The frozen functional-standard atlas of 64,178 saturation genome editing variants across seven cancer-susceptibility genes (46,392 SNVs and 17,786 indels), uniformly processed on MANE-Select transcripts.- All nineteen predictor score columns.- Per-stratum reliability and attenuation-ceiling estimates.- The predictor-definition sweep and the reliability-correction simulation.- The MaveDB deposit survey.Environments are pinned exactly; raw and frozen data carry SHA-256 manifests; the pipeline is platform-independent and requires Python 3.12 or newer. DATA PROVENANCEThe saturation genome editing measurements are third-party public deposits, cited by accession and not redistributed here: MaveDB urn:mavedb:00000662-0-1 (BAP1), 00001250-a-2 (BARD1), 00000097-0-2 (BRCA1), 00001225-a-1 (BRCA2), 00001259-a-2 (PALB2), 00000673-0-1 (RAD51C) and 00000675-a-1 (VHL). RELATEDCompanion deposit (splice-region calibration benchmark), all versions: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.22674887Manuscript preprint: [bioRxiv DOI — add after posting] Use of large language models: large language model assistance was used to write analysis code and in preparing the manuscript. No data were generated by the model. LICENSING — PLEASE READ BEFORE REUSEThe licence field of this record (MIT) covers the code only. The frozen assay matrix (data/frozen/frozen-matrix-v1.parquet, which holds no predictor column) is released under CC BY 4.0, compatible with all seven upstream MaveDB deposits. The score matrices and everything derived from them carry mixed terms, column by column, across nineteen third-party predictors. Eight columns are more restrictive than CC BY 4.0 (AlphaGenome, CADD, AlphaMissense, Nucleotide Transformer, SpliceAI, REVEL, PrimateAI, VEST4; AlphaMissense and Nucleotide Transformer are ShareAlike as well as NonCommercial), eight require attribution only, and for three (BayesDel, ClinPred, MetaRNN) no licence statement could be located, which must not be read as permission. Per-column terms are in results/predictor_resources_v1.tsv; the full statement is in LICENSE-DATA.

View source

Similar papers

#computer vision Open access Jun 2016

Software Development in Startup Companies: The Greenfield Startup Model

The results are packaged in the Greenfield Startup Model (GSM), which explains the priority of startups to release the product as quickly as possible, and the need to shorten time-to-market, by speeding up the development through low-precision engineering activities.

Carmine Giardino, Nicolò Paternoster, M. Unterkalmsteiner et al. · 178 citations · ⚡14
#computer vision Open access Oct 2016

Software Startups - A Research Agenda

Software startup companies develop innovative, software-intensive products within limited timeframes and with few resources, searching for sustainable and scalable business models.

M. Unterkalmsteiner, P. Abrahamsson, Xiaofeng Wang et al. · 157 citations · ⚡17
#machine learning Review Open access Oct 2016

“Failures” to be celebrated: an analysis of major pivots of software startups

This study conducts a case survey study based on the secondary data of the major pivots happened in 49 software startups, and demonstrates that customer need pivot is the most common among all pivot types.

Sohaib Shahid Bajwa, Xiaofeng Wang, Anh Nguyen-Duc et al. · 127 citations · ⚡15
#computer vision Review Open access May 2015

A survey study on major technical barriers affecting the decision to adopt cloud services

The comparison of adopter and non-adopter sample reveals three potential adoption inhibitor, security, data privacy, and portability, which underlines the importance of the technical and security perspectives for research investigating the adoption of technology.

Nattakarn Phaphoom, Xiaofeng Wang, S. Samuel et al. · 111 citations · ⚡8
#computer vision Conference Open access Dec 2013

Affordable and Energy-Efficient Cloud Computing Clusters: The Bolzano Raspberry Pi Cloud Cluster Experiment

The ongoing work building a Raspberry Pi cluster consisting of 300 nodes is presented, with potential use cases being an inexpensive and green test bed for cloud computing research and a robust and mobile data center for operating in adverse environments.

P. Abrahamsson, S. Helmer, Nattakarn Phaphoom et al. · 110 citations · ⚡7
#computer vision Conference Aug 2008

A Preliminary Roadmap for Empirical Research on Agile Software Development

Some claim that especially in the field of agile software development the research lags years behind of the practice. In this paper, we characterize the status and main challenges for research on agile software development, and propose a preliminary roadmap, focusing on providing more empirical research, primarily on e...

Torgeir Dingsøyr, T. Dybå, P. Abrahamsson · 92 citations · ⚡7

Related blog posts

MIT News · Artificial Intelligence Sep 14, 2026

New method enables AI for safety-critical situations

The “HardFlow” algorithm could help generative AI models produce high-quality outputs that obey strict requirements when “pretty close” doesn’t cut it.

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.