A layered curriculum architecture designed to support resilience under conditions of paradigm-level technological uncertainty is proposed, which enables incremental innovation through pilot modules while preserving long-term structural coherence.
Abstract
The rapid transformation of software development—driven by generative AI, AI-augmented workflows, low-code/no-code environments, and the early emergence of quantum computation—challenges the structural stability of ICT curricula. As introductory programming tasks become increasingly automatable, traditional curriculum models risk reactive reform rather than systematic adaptation.This paper proposes a layered curriculum architecture designed to support resilience under conditions of paradigm-level technological uncertainty. Grounded in prior research on AI-assisted programming and LCNC-based CDIO integration, and informed by institutional curriculum mapping within ICT degree programs, the study develops a four-layer educational ecosystem model. The model integrates foundational programming competencies, structured AI-augmented workflows, experimental studio-based environments, and introductory quantum literacy modules.Rather than organizing curricula around specific tools, the framework emphasizes modularity, paradigm agility, and durable cognitive skills such as abstraction, verification, and metacognitive awareness. The proposed architecture enables incremental innovation through pilot modules while preserving long-term structural coherence.By shifting the focus from technology prediction to systematic adaptability, the paper contributes a design-oriented model for future-resilient ICT education.
The study proposes and verifies a framework intended to support curriculum alignment, instructional control, and academic integrity preservation within AI-enabled learning systems, and contributes a systems-oriented framework for embedding AI within educational systems while preserving pedagogical intent and governance...
Ali Ahsan, Hayden McDonald, R. Saha et al.· Systems· 0 citations
A systematic review of peer-reviewed studies published between 2015 and 2024 concludes that while tools such as generative artificial intelligence, intelligent tutoring systems, virtual and augmented reality, and predictive analytics are increasingly present, their adoption is concentrated in specific areas, particular...
Firas Almasri· International journal of tec...· 0 citations
A six-phase AI-assisted instructional design architecture based on the Curriculum as Code paradigm, integrating Generative AI with LaTeX and Python to automate the creation of reproducible, visually consistent, and technically precise materials for STEM education is presented.
It is argued for targeted modernization around durable capabilities rather than wholesale curriculum replacement, and the evidence limits are explicit about evidence limits: labor signals are confounded by non-AI forces, industry reports are directional, and the pilot is exploratory.
This constructive position paper proposes the “vibe-designer”—a new professional paradigm that strategically compresses the traditional middle phase of the engineering curriculum to focus on high-level specification, adversarial evaluation, and systemic contextualization.
Ilya Levin, A. Gero· Innovations in Pedagogy and...· 0 citations
It is concluded that educating the agentic engineer requires systemic transformation rather than incremental curricular change: instruction must shift from producing artifacts to exercising judgment over increasingly autonomous socio-technical systems.
Mamdouh Alenezi· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.