The study proposes and verifies a framework intended to support curriculum alignment, instructional control, and academic integrity preservation within AI-enabled learning systems, and contributes a systems-oriented framework for embedding AI within educational systems while preserving pedagogical intent and governance requirements.
Abstract
Artificial intelligence (AI) is rapidly transforming higher education. Notably, institutions are increasingly deploying AI-enabled chatbots across administrative, teaching and learning, and research functions. Despite the proliferation of these tools, most conversational systems remain generic and disconnected from subject-level context, curriculum design, and academic integrity requirements. A design-oriented framework is proposed in this paper to improve the effectiveness of AI-enabled chatbots used in teaching and learning, embedded within curriculum. The framework is grounded in systems thinking for context-aware AI-enabled learning systems that operate within bounded pedagogical and disciplinary environments. Adopting a design science approach, the study synthesises expert-informed insights from pedagogical, programmatic, and subject-level perspectives to develop a framework that integrates context alignment, instructional control, and integrity-preserving guardrails. The resulting artefact was verified through artefact-focused testing against the proposed design objectives using a structured non-human evaluation protocol, including requirement-based testing, baseline comparison with generic AI systems, academic integrity stress testing, and robustness analysis. The study proposes and verifies a framework intended to support curriculum alignment, instructional control, and academic integrity preservation within AI-enabled learning systems. The paper contributes a systems-oriented framework for embedding AI within educational systems while preserving pedagogical intent and governance requirements. Implications for scalable deployment of AI in higher education and future human-centred evaluation are discussed.
This review examines how AI is integrated into EFL/ESL education across language skills, instructional domains, and educational contexts and conceptualises AI in EFL/ESL education as a pedagogical ecology in which tools, learners, teachers, feedback regimes, assessment practices, institutional infrastructures, and gove...
Arash Javadinejad, M. Davari· Frontiers in Education· 0 citations
The paper proposes a set of guiding principles derived from the identified tensions, emphasising teacher-mediated interaction, developmental calibration of AI use, transparency, curriculum alignment, privacy protection and equity considerations, which provide a structured basis for integrating AI in ways that support l...
The characteristics and quality of lesson plan designs generated by four AI platforms – ChatGPT, Gemini, Claude, and DeepSeek – are investigated by contrasting and comparing the solutions each provides and highlighting their key similarities and differences.
Ana Tripković, Valentina Gavranović· SINTEZA· 0 citations
The Instructional Model for Human-Centered Generative AI Engagement is introduced, a pedagogical framework designed to help faculty guide students in engaging with generative AI as a thinking partner rather than a shortcut.
A. Miles, Paige Haber-Curran, Khalid H. Arar· Open Praxis· 0 citations
The research outcomes demonstrate that AIAS functions effectively as a learning architecture, aligning academic integrity with instructional design, and offers a replicable model for fashion programs and other disciplines seeking responsible AI integration.
D. Shen· PUPIL International Journal...· 0 citations
It is argued that students' needs matter on their own, the field should start from what students need when deciding how to use AI in design education, and good educational frameworks should be anchored in the learner, not driven by technology.
Antong Zhang· AHFE International· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.