Oct 2026· International journal of technology in education and science· 0 citations
TL;DR
A systematic review of peer-reviewed studies published between 2015 and 2024 concludes that while tools such as generative artificial intelligence, intelligent tutoring systems, virtual and augmented reality, and predictive analytics are increasingly present, their adoption is concentrated in specific areas, particularly problem-solving, simulation, and assessment.
Abstract
The rapid rise of artificial intelligence is reshaping higher education, yet its role in engineering education remains fragmented and unevenly understood. This systematic review synthesized sixty-nine peer-reviewed studies published between 2015 and 2024 to examine how artificial intelligence tools are being integrated into engineering curricula. Guided by a technology–pedagogy–ethics framework, the analysis explored the types of artificial intelligence tools employed, their pedagogical applications, and the ethical concerns associated with their use. The findings indicate that while tools such as generative artificial intelligence, intelligent tutoring systems, virtual and augmented reality, and predictive analytics are increasingly present, their adoption is concentrated in specific areas, particularly problem-solving, simulation, and assessment. By contrast, applications supporting collaborative learning, industry-linked design projects, and ethical training remain limited. Generative artificial intelligence emerged as both the most rapidly adopted and the most ethically contested technology, raising questions about academic integrity and originality. This review contributes by offering a discipline-specific synthesis that highlights the pedagogical opportunities and risks of artificial intelligence in engineering education and calls for more deliberate alignment of technological innovation with educational practice and ethical responsibility.
The study identifies a persistent fragmentation in existing research and proposes the Integrated Challenge Model for AI Curriculum Development (ICM-AI-CD), which conceptualizes AI integration as a dynamic socio-technical system comprising interdependent ethical-policy, pedagogical-design, and technical-institutional do...
Abdul Malik· Applied Business: Issues &am...· 0 citations
This narrative review argues that the most consequential effect of GenAI is not the automation of existing teaching practices but the need to redesign curricula, learning outcomes, pedagogies, and assessment around disciplinary judgment, critical verification, intellectual independence, and transparent, ethical use of...
C. Papaneophytou, Stella A. Nicolaou· Trends in Higher Education· 0 citations
The preliminary findings suggest that Generative artificial intelligence use in engineering education requires attention not only to tool access or technical performance, but also to students’ interaction strategies, verification practices, and ethical evaluation of context-specific uses.
Ascensión López-Vargas, Javier Rodríguez-Vidal, Ángel García-Beltrán et al.· Education and Information Te...· 0 citations
The findings suggest that the pedagogical transformation enabled by artificial intelligence depends less on the sophistication of the technologies themselves and more on the institutional capacity to establish curricular guidelines, implement ethical policies, and foster critical digital competencies among both teacher...
Félix Antonio Díaz, Juan Carlos Toribio Fernández, J. Martínez-Alonzo et al.· MENTOR revista de investigac...· 0 citations
Empirical evidence is contributed from educational action research showing that structured pedagogical interventions can promote the critical, ethical, and responsible use of Generative Artificial Intelligence in education.
Rodrigo Florêncio da Silva· Information· 1 citation
It is shown that successful GenAI integration requires a balanced approach combining technological capability, pedagogical redesign, and responsible governance, and that successful GenAI integration requires a balanced approach combining technological capability, pedagogical redesign, and responsible governance.
Syusinka Rahmatika, Martanto, Ryan Hamonangan· Immortalis Journal of Interd...· 0 citations
Related blog posts
MIT News · Artificial Intelligence· news.mit.eduOct 15, 2026
AI is moving beyond impressive demos. After World Summit AI 2026 in Amsterdam, GPT-Lab's Muhammad Waseem reflects on what organizations need to make AI agents reliable, responsible and genuinely useful in everyday work. The post Building trustworthy AI: The role of AI harnesses, intent contracts and evals appeared first on GPT-Lab.
Learn how Google DeepMind and GovTech Singapore uses lightweight on-device Gemma models to intercept conversational scams in private chats with zero cloud data egress.
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.