Back to #explainable ai

Machine learning-assisted spectroscopic approaches for pesticide residue detection in food matrices.

Oct 2026 · Food Research International · Vol 242 Pt 5, pp. 120168 · 0 citations · 66 references
Medicine

Abstract

The widespread use of pesticides in modern agriculture has substantially improved food production while raising serious concerns regarding contamination and food safety. Considerable scientific effort has focused on improving methods for monitoring and detecting pesticide residues in food to enhance safety assurance. Although chromatography coupled with mass spectrometry remains the gold standard, its routine application is constrained by high costs, labor-intensive sample preparation, and prolonged analysis times. Recent advances in spectroscopic techniques, including surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy (SERS), Raman spectroscopy, hyperspectral imaging (HSI), and near-infrared (NIR) spectroscopy, offer promising non-destructive, rapid, and sensitive alternatives for pesticide residue detection across diverse food matrices. When integrated with machine learning (ML), these approaches further improve predictive accuracy and analytical robustness. This review synthesizes recent advances in ML-assisted spectroscopic approaches for pesticide residue detection across diverse food matrices, with emphasis on analytical performance, preprocessing strategies, feature engineering, and model selection. Convolutional neural networks (CNNs), support vector machines (SVMs), random forests (RFs), and ensemble learning methods are increasingly used to improve classification and quantitative prediction. Across the reviewed studies, analytical performance was generally strong, with high classification accuracies, while the lowest reported detection limit was achieved using a SERS-CNN platform. Despite these advances, key limitations remain, including reliance on laboratory-spiked samples, small dataset sizes, matrix interference, inconsistent validation strategies, high computational demands associated with high-dimensional spectral data, and limited field validation. Future directions should focus on hybrid AI-driven sensors, IoT integration, advanced data augmentation, QuEChERS-assisted preprocessing, and explainable AI to improve real-world applicability and interpretability.

View source

Similar papers

#explainable ai Aug 2026

AI and Bullshit

It is argued that both AI and bullshitters are untrustworthy informants, and for similar reasons, it is natural to describe AI’s informational outputs as bullshit, as it signals their distinctive kind of epistemic deficiencies, which they share with bullshit.

Duncan Pritchard · 1 citation
#explainable ai Review Sep 2026

Advancing stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation: a systematic review of machine learning-based risk prediction models

In light of the pervasive methodological limitations identified, including high analytic risk of bias, absence of external validation, and lack of model interpretability, claims of ML superiority over CHA2DS2-VASc must be interpreted with caution.

Md. Mohaimenul Islam, Arinzechukwu Nkemdirim Okere · 0 citations

Reinforcement Loads Prediction of Geosynthetic-Reinforced Soil Structures Using Explainable and Nonexplainable Machine Learning Approaches

This study presents three advanced machine learning models: the evolutionary Gaussian process inference model, the artificial satellite search algorithm–moment balance machine (ASSA-MBM), and the Operation Rain Forest (ORF), which are designed to predict the maximum reinforcement load in geosynthetic-reinforced soil structures. These models were developed to enhance both predictive accuracy and model interpretability by incorporating state-of-the-art optimization algorithms and explainable machine learning frameworks. A comprehensive evaluation was conducted using 10-fold cross-validation, and the proposed models were benchmarked against previously developed AI models from literature, as well as traditional and semiempirical approaches such as Rankine, Coulomb, and K -stiffness. Among the proposed models, ASSA-MBM consistently achieved the best performance, recording the lowest testing root mean squared error (0.617), the highest correlation coefficient ( R = 0.918 ), and the highest reference index ( RI = 0.951 ). Additionally, the ORF model offers transparency by generating mathematical regression equations, which are crucial in geotechnical engineering.

Min-Yuan Cheng, Akhmad F. K. Khitam, Jia-Wang Liou · 0 citations

Related blog posts