Skip to content

SweepLSD: A One-Pass, O(width)-Memory Line Segment Detector with an Integer-Only Streaming Core and a Real-Time FPGA Realization

Yoshiyasu Shimizu
Aug 2026 · 0 citations · 43 references
Engineering Computer Science

TL;DR

The first complete description of SweepLSD is given, a line segment detector that reads the image exactly once and emits each segment within a few rows of its last pixel passing the scan line, with the tightest frame-time distribution and the best per-segment direction accuracy of the four detectors.

Abstract

We present SweepLSD, a line segment detector that reads the image exactly once and emits each segment within a few rows of its last pixel passing the scan line. Every stage, including connected-component labeling and the final line test, processes the image as a row stream: intermediate memory is O(width) rather than O(pixels), and the per-pixel core is integer-only. We give the first complete description of the algorithm, designed in the author's 2014 master's thesis but never published, together with an open-source C++17 implementation and an FPGA realization -- held bit-exact against the software in its hardware configuration -- detecting segments in live 1080p30 video on 2009-era silicon without frame buffer or external memory. On structure-rich public 4K photographs downscaled to Full-HD, one CPU thread detects segments in ~11 ms -- 4.6x/5.2x/25x faster than the original authors'implementations of ELSED, EDLines, and LSD -- with the tightest frame-time distribution and the best per-segment direction accuracy of the four detectors, and curve rejection by design, while trailing ELSED in F-score on synthetic ground truth. A Manhattan-frame vanishing-point study on York Urban and NYU-VP scores every detector under a selection/evaluation-separated best-estimator-per-detector protocol, under which SweepLSD leads on NYU-VP by ~0.3 degrees and trails by 0.1 degrees on York Urban, with the fastest end-to-end pipeline of the four detectors on both. A single-frame camera-attitude application, evaluated on synthetic scenes with exact ground truth and on EuRoC and TUM-VI, matches the baselines'accuracy at a fraction of their memory, and drives a 4K horizon lock to 0.06 degrees median attitude error at 32 ms median per frame.

View source

Similar papers

#software testing Review Aug 2026

Model-Based Agentic Software Engineering

MAGE explains how externalized knowledge, bounded action, independent evaluation, and retained human authority can compose into a governed engineering environment, and proposes tests of when that environment turns commodity intelligence into durable engineering progress.

James C. Davis, Kelechi G. Kalu, Huiyun Peng et al. · 1 citation
#software testing Preprint Aug 2026

Evaluating Inference-Time Defenses Against Package Hallucination in LLM-Generated Code

LLMs are increasingly used for code generation, yet they frequently hallucinate non-existent software packages, creating exploitable entry points into the software supply chain. We make four contributions to this problem. First, we show that prior evaluation methodologies systematically inflate hallucination rates by misclassifying standard-library modules as hallucinations in some languages. For Python, the overestimation reaches 9.4 percentage points. Second, we evaluate seven inference-time defenses for mitigating package hallucinations, including five guided decoding strategies (Greedy, Contrastive, DoLa, Nudging, and Active Layer-Contrastive Decoding), an iterative self-refinement approach (Self-Refine), and a Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG)-based defense.. Across eight models spanning five families and four programming languages (Python, JavaScript, Ruby, Rust), RAG reduces the package hallucination rate (PHR) in 18 of 32 model--language configurations. Third, we introduce Package Utility (PU) to assess whether defenses preserve valid and task-relevant recommendations. Among strategies evaluated, Greedy decoding provides the strongest average mitigation--utility trade-off. Fourth, we stress-test all strategies under adversarial prompts seeded with fabricated package names and find that PHR surges by up to 45 percentage points relative to standard prompts, with Ruby consistently the most vulnerable language (80.9--95.2\%). Under adversarial conditions, RAG and Self-Refine outperform all decoding-only strategies, indicating that robust defense requires either external grounding or iterative self-verification when prompts are actively hostile. Our results recast package hallucination as both a measurement problem and a decoding-time control problem, and they demonstrate that the choice of defense must be matched to the threat model and recommendation utility.

Albérick Euraste Djiré, Iyiola E. Olatunji, Melissa Tessa et al. · 1 citation
#software testing Open access Aug 2026

HawkEye: Web Vulnerability Analysis and Security Audit Tool

HawkEye is introduced, a modular, web-based vulnerability auditing platform designed to streamline security analysis by integrating multiple scanning tools within a unified dashboard and illustrates how consolidated reporting improves vulnerability prioritization for development teams.

D. R. Patil, Varad Salgare, Devaj Arya et al. · 0 citations
#software testing Review Open access Sep 2026

Application for Tracking Bugs in Software Development: Improving Project Management Efficiency

By streamlining workflows and fostering collaboration, this platform offers a scalable, cost- effective solution for SMEs and contributes to software engineering by demonstrating how integrated technologies can modernize development processes in resource limited contexts, with potential for broader adoption in Albania and beyond.

Griselda Belba TRUPJA, Agim Kasaj · 0 citations
#software testing Open access Sep 2026

Prevalence of non-union complication in femoral shaft fracture patients who underwent IM nailing surgery in Fatemi Hospital Ardabil.

The findings of the present study indicated that potential complications such as delayed union, nonunion, and osteomyelitis in the intramedullary nailing method are approximately comparable to those of the external fixator method.

Reza Noktesanj, Ali Nami, F. Amani et al. · 0 citations

Related blog posts

MIT News · Artificial Intelligence Aug 17, 2026

Q&A: Rethinking how innovation happens

In his latest book, Professor Eugene Fitzgerald examines the forces that turn breakthroughs into value — and why innovation resists simple formulas.