Abstract This chapter examines how innovation and knowledge exchange can act as key enablers of sustainable economic transformation within BRICS economies – Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa. Set against the backdrop of climate change, resource constraints and socio-economic inequalities, this chapter argues that sustainability-oriented growth in emerging economies requires a strategic integration of technological innovation, institutional support and cross-border knowledge sharing. Drawing on established theoretical frameworks such as the Triple Helix model, Open Innovation theory, sustainability-oriented innovation and knowledge management perspectives, this chapter provides a comprehensive conceptual foundation linking innovation processes with sustainable development goals. The analysis highlights the heterogeneous innovation trajectories of BRICS nations, shaped by differences in industrial structure, R&D intensity, institutional capacity and sectoral strengths. It reviews innovation performance across key domains – including manufacturing, digital technologies, clean energy, and agriculture – and demonstrates how national flagship initiatives and science, technology and innovation (STI) policies contribute to sustainability outcomes. This chapter further emphasises the catalytic role of knowledge sharing through formal mechanisms such as joint research programmes, policy coordination platforms, researcher mobility schemes and shared digital infrastructures, as well as informal channels that support the rapid diffusion of tacit knowledge. This chapter critically discusses persistent challenges, including funding asymmetries, regulatory fragmentation, infrastructure gaps and uneven absorptive capacities across BRICS countries. Building on empirical illustrations and comparative insights, it proposes strategic pathways focused on digital transformation, inclusive innovation ecosystems, harmonised policy frameworks and human capital development.
The results are packaged in the Greenfield Startup Model (GSM), which explains the priority of startups to release the product as quickly as possible, and the need to shorten time-to-market, by speeding up the development through low-precision engineering activities.
Carmine Giardino, Nicolò Paternoster, M. Unterkalmsteiner et al.· IEEE Transactions on Softwar...· 178 citations· ⚡14
Software startup companies develop innovative, software-intensive products within limited timeframes and with few resources, searching for sustainable and scalable business models.
M. Unterkalmsteiner, P. Abrahamsson, Xiaofeng Wang et al.· e-Informatica Software Engin...· 157 citations· ⚡17
This study conducts a case survey study based on the secondary data of the major pivots happened in 49 software startups, and demonstrates that customer need pivot is the most common among all pivot types.
Sohaib Shahid Bajwa, Xiaofeng Wang, Anh Nguyen-Duc et al.· Empirical Software Engineeri...· 127 citations· ⚡15
The comparison of adopter and non-adopter sample reveals three potential adoption inhibitor, security, data privacy, and portability, which underlines the importance of the technical and security perspectives for research investigating the adoption of technology.
Nattakarn Phaphoom, Xiaofeng Wang, S. Samuel et al.· Journal of Systems and Softw...· 111 citations· ⚡8
This study investigates how Lean internal startup facilitates software product innovation in large companies and identifies its enablers and inhibitors, and shows the potential of the method-in-action framework to investigate the Lean startup approach in non-startup context.
Henry Edison, Nina M. Smørsgård, Xiaofeng Wang et al.· Journal of Systems and Softw...· 78 citations· ⚡6
The application of agile software methods and more recently the integration of Lean practices contribute to the trend of continuous improvement in the software industry. One such area warranting proper empirical evidence is a project’s operational efficiency when using the Kanban method. This short paper takes a new an...
Marko Ikonen, Petri Kettunen, Nilay V. Oza et al.· EUROMICRO Conference on Soft...· 67 citations· ⚡9
Related blog posts
Microsoft Research Blog· microsoft.comOct 12, 2026
StudentSim is a research system for evaluating and improving AI tutoring tools before they are tested with learners. It models how individuals may engage with tutors, giving feedback to improve tutor performance across subjects like chess, writing, and mathematics. The post Simulating student learning for better AI tutoring appeared first on Microsoft Research.