Skip to content
#diffusion models Open access

A Physics-Informed Neural Network Atlas: Sub-Percent on Smooth Forward PDEs, Orders Worse on Inverse, High-Frequency and Real Data

Sep 2026 · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)

Abstract

Physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) are promoted as a general differential-equation solver, but the accuracy actually achieved varies by orders of magnitude across problem types, and that variation is rarely laid out in one place. This report is a method atlas: a runnable catalogue in which each of the state-of-the-art PINN families (hard constraints, residual-based adaptive sampling, Fourier features, domain decomposition, operator learning, physics-informed operators, conformal-prediction uncertainty, structure-preserving Hamiltonian learning, and inverse solving) is exercised on at least one differential-equation case, trained by a dedicated engine, validated against an analytic or numerical reference, and scored by relative L2 error. Across the seventeen cases with an archived reference-validated error, the result is a clean stratification. PINNs reach sub-percent accuracy on smooth, well-posed forward PDEs (a one-dimensional wave at 5e-5, a reaction-diffusion Allen-Cahn field at 1.2e-3, several mining and transport reduced models below 1e-3), with ten of seventeen cases under 1% relative error. But they degrade by two to three orders of magnitude on the hard classes: inverse problems (4e-2), high-wavenumber Helmholtz (1.0e-1), the lid-driven cavity Navier-Stokes benchmark (1.7e-1), operator learning (5.6e-2), and real noisy field data (6.9e-2). The finding matches the field's own failure-mode literature: PINNs are an accurate and flexible instrument where the solution is smooth and the problem well-posed, and they are not a drop-in replacement for a good classical solver where it is not. Every case ships its equations, its method, a synthetic provenance label, and a reproducible error; every number and figure regenerates from the archived artifacts. Runnable catalogue and reproducible pipeline (MIT): https://github.com/fsantibanezleal/CAOS_PINNLAB ; catalogue: https://pinnlab.fasl-work.com .

View source

Similar papers

#computer vision Open access Jun 2016

Software Development in Startup Companies: The Greenfield Startup Model

The results are packaged in the Greenfield Startup Model (GSM), which explains the priority of startups to release the product as quickly as possible, and the need to shorten time-to-market, by speeding up the development through low-precision engineering activities.

Carmine Giardino, Nicolò Paternoster, M. Unterkalmsteiner et al. · 178 citations · ⚡14
#computer vision Open access Oct 2016

Software Startups - A Research Agenda

Software startup companies develop innovative, software-intensive products within limited timeframes and with few resources, searching for sustainable and scalable business models.

M. Unterkalmsteiner, P. Abrahamsson, Xiaofeng Wang et al. · 157 citations · ⚡17
#machine learning Review Open access Oct 2016

“Failures” to be celebrated: an analysis of major pivots of software startups

This study conducts a case survey study based on the secondary data of the major pivots happened in 49 software startups, and demonstrates that customer need pivot is the most common among all pivot types.

Sohaib Shahid Bajwa, Xiaofeng Wang, Anh Nguyen-Duc et al. · 127 citations · ⚡15
#computer vision Review Open access May 2015

A survey study on major technical barriers affecting the decision to adopt cloud services

The comparison of adopter and non-adopter sample reveals three potential adoption inhibitor, security, data privacy, and portability, which underlines the importance of the technical and security perspectives for research investigating the adoption of technology.

Nattakarn Phaphoom, Xiaofeng Wang, S. Samuel et al. · 111 citations · ⚡8
#computer vision Open access Feb 2018

Lean Internal Startups for Software Product Innovation in Large Companies: Enablers and Inhibitors

This study investigates how Lean internal startup facilitates software product innovation in large companies and identifies its enablers and inhibitors, and shows the potential of the method-in-action framework to investigate the Lean startup approach in non-startup context.

Henry Edison, Nina M. Smørsgård, Xiaofeng Wang et al. · 78 citations · ⚡6
#computer vision Conference Sep 2010

Exploring the Sources of Waste in Kanban Software Development Projects

The application of agile software methods and more recently the integration of Lean practices contribute to the trend of continuous improvement in the software industry. One such area warranting proper empirical evidence is a project’s operational efficiency when using the Kanban method. This short paper takes a new an...

Marko Ikonen, Petri Kettunen, Nilay V. Oza et al. · 67 citations · ⚡9

Related blog posts

Microsoft Research Blog Oct 12, 2026

Simulating student learning for better AI tutoring

StudentSim is a research system for evaluating and improving AI tutoring tools before they are tested with learners. It models how individuals may engage with tutors, giving feedback to improve tutor performance across subjects like chess, writing, and mathematics. The post Simulating student learning for better AI tutoring appeared first on Microsoft Research.

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.