Skip to content
#large language models Dataset Open access

LLM-MovieLens: A Portable Pipeline and Testbed for LLM-Synthesized Item Profiles

Sep 2026 · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)

Abstract

LLM-MovieLens is a portable pipeline that turns a catalogue's structured metadata into LLM-synthesized item features, together with the evaluation harness needed to find out whether those features help a recommender. A language model reads an item's metadata and writes an 80–120 word profile, a ten-axis mood vector and 3–5 key themes; the harness encodes that text once, offline, and evaluates it under a temporal split, five seeds and full ranking. This record archives the exact bytes the accompanying paper's numbers were computed on. How the files fit together The code surface is one archive. The data surface is split into parts, because most of its weight is the embedding arrays and a single large file is a poor thing to download over a slow connection. Every part unpacks to the same hf/ or github/ root: extract them all into one directory and you have the released tree exactly. shasum -a256 -c SHA256SUMS, run from inside github/ and from inside hf/, then verifies all 248 and 55 files — the README.md in this record gives the exact commands and says what a partial download looks like. Each part is independently useful too — take data-core alone for the dataset card, licence, datasheet, Croissant record, prompt manifest and the complete human-evaluation study, then add only the catalogue and encoder you need. What the data archive contains 10,381 film profiles for the genome-covered items of MovieLens 20M, generated with Claude Haiku 4.5, and a second, independent generation of the same catalogue with GPT-4o-mini. 9,289 book profiles for Amazon-Books, a catalogue with no tag-genome equivalent, produced by the same pipeline into the same output schema. Pre-computed embeddings of the generated text — profile, mood and theme matrices — under bge-large-en-v1.5 and e5-large-v2. A 500-profile, three-annotator human evaluation: 15,000 five-point Likert judgments over two generating models and five quality axes, plus 3,000 forced-choice mood judgments, with the blank sheets, the filled sheets and the agreement analysis. A Croissant 1.0 record, a datasheet, the prompt-provenance manifest, and SHA-256 digests of every file. What the code archive contains The profile generator, the embedding generator and the benchmark harness. 14 benchmark configurations × 5 seeds = 70 runs, with the per-seed result files those runs produced, under a temporal split, full ranking and cold-start stratification. A one-command verifier that recomputes the paper's headline numbers from the released result files in about a minute, without a GPU. A split rebuilder: no source interactions are redistributed, so the splits are reconstructed from MovieLens 20M and SHA-256-checked against ours. A new sentence encoder, generating model, catalogue or recommendation method is a path override, not a fork. Licensing — this release is split Zenodo records carry one licence field, so the more restrictive of the two is selected above. In full: CC BY 4.0 — all code, the benchmark result files, the human-evaluation annotations, the metadata and the documentation. These are our own work end to end and carry no upstream restriction. CC BY-NC 4.0 — the generated profiles and their embeddings. They are our output, but generated from sources whose own terms are non-commercial, and we cannot grant rights we do not hold. Research use is unrestricted under both. The full text is in LICENSE inside each archive. Not redistributed No MovieLens interaction data, no tag genome or transformation of it, and no cached third-party item metadata. The harness rebuilds what it needs from the upstream sources. This product uses the TMDB API but is not endorsed, certified, or otherwise approved by TMDB.

View source

Similar papers

#computer vision Open access Jun 2016

Software Development in Startup Companies: The Greenfield Startup Model

The results are packaged in the Greenfield Startup Model (GSM), which explains the priority of startups to release the product as quickly as possible, and the need to shorten time-to-market, by speeding up the development through low-precision engineering activities.

Carmine Giardino, Nicolò Paternoster, M. Unterkalmsteiner et al. · 178 citations · ⚡14
#computer vision Open access Oct 2016

Software Startups - A Research Agenda

Software startup companies develop innovative, software-intensive products within limited timeframes and with few resources, searching for sustainable and scalable business models.

M. Unterkalmsteiner, P. Abrahamsson, Xiaofeng Wang et al. · 157 citations · ⚡17
#machine learning Review Open access Oct 2016

“Failures” to be celebrated: an analysis of major pivots of software startups

This study conducts a case survey study based on the secondary data of the major pivots happened in 49 software startups, and demonstrates that customer need pivot is the most common among all pivot types.

Sohaib Shahid Bajwa, Xiaofeng Wang, Anh Nguyen-Duc et al. · 127 citations · ⚡15
#computer vision Review Open access May 2015

A survey study on major technical barriers affecting the decision to adopt cloud services

The comparison of adopter and non-adopter sample reveals three potential adoption inhibitor, security, data privacy, and portability, which underlines the importance of the technical and security perspectives for research investigating the adoption of technology.

Nattakarn Phaphoom, Xiaofeng Wang, S. Samuel et al. · 111 citations · ⚡8
#computer vision Conference Open access Dec 2013

Affordable and Energy-Efficient Cloud Computing Clusters: The Bolzano Raspberry Pi Cloud Cluster Experiment

The ongoing work building a Raspberry Pi cluster consisting of 300 nodes is presented, with potential use cases being an inexpensive and green test bed for cloud computing research and a robust and mobile data center for operating in adverse environments.

P. Abrahamsson, S. Helmer, Nattakarn Phaphoom et al. · 110 citations · ⚡7
#computer vision Book Open access Mar 2017

On the Unhappiness of Software Developers

The results indicate that software developers are a slightly happy population, but the need for limiting the unhappiness of developers remains, and 219 factors representing causes of unhappiness while developing software are identified.

D. Graziotin, Fabian Fagerholm, Xiaofeng Wang et al. · 84 citations · ⚡6

Related blog posts

Microsoft Research Blog Oct 12, 2026

Simulating student learning for better AI tutoring

StudentSim is a research system for evaluating and improving AI tutoring tools before they are tested with learners. It models how individuals may engage with tutors, giving feedback to improve tutor performance across subjects like chess, writing, and mathematics. The post Simulating student learning for better AI tutoring appeared first on Microsoft Research.

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.