Sep 2026· Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Abstract
Preprint, version 1.0 (September 2026) The Transformer of 2017 still sits at the core of every current large language model, yet almost everything around it has been rebuilt, some parts repeatedly. This survey traces the architectural development of text-only LLMs from 2017 to early 2026 as four epochs, each driven by a concrete bottleneck. In the exploration epoch (2018–2019), encoder-, decoder-, and encoder-decoder designs competed, and decoder-only prevailed for structural reasons that paid off only later. In the scaling epoch (2020–2022), capability was bought with parameters and data, while the first efficiency ideas failed for lack of a binding problem. In the efficiency epoch (2023–2024), inference cost became that problem: the field converged on the modern decoder recipe, attacked the KV cache factor by factor (GQA, MLA, sliding windows, paging), and revived mixture-of-experts and recurrent sequence mixing; nearly every mechanism was a rediscovery of a previously shelved idea. In the convergence epoch (2025–2026), independent model families arrived at the same design principle: a small minority of full-attention layers, interleaved with linear mixers and routed experts, retained to restore the exact recall that fixed-size states surrender. In parallel, reasoning models opened a test-time-compute axis whose cost lands on the same object: the memory a model carries per generated token. I synthesize four long-run development lines, compare the architecture families qualitatively, and state the open problems, including the 2026 dissent over the attention operator itself. Every core concept is explained once and in full, so the survey serves simultaneously as an introduction for students and a reference for researchers. Contents Introduction Foundations: The Transformer Epoch I: Exploration (2018–2019) Epoch II: Scaling (2020–2022) Epoch III: Efficiency and the Open Wave (2023–2024) Epoch IV: Convergence and New Axes (2025–2026) Synthesis: Nine Years in Four Lines Conclusion 48 pages, 14 figures, 9 tables, 116 references. Also available at https://finnrmn.com/papers/llm-architectures/.
Supporting data, adapters, predictions and code for the article *Low-Cost LoRA Fine-Tuning of Small Language Models for Multi-Step Arithmetic Reasoning* by Jake O'Grady, Asena Isik Gürhan, Chee Fong Ting and Effirul Ramlan (University of Galway). We generated 20,000 GSM8K-derived arithmetic problems with step-by-step s...
O'Grady, Jake, Gürhan, Asena Isik, Chee, Fong Ting et al.· Zenodo (CERN European Organi...· 465 citations
The results are packaged in the Greenfield Startup Model (GSM), which explains the priority of startups to release the product as quickly as possible, and the need to shorten time-to-market, by speeding up the development through low-precision engineering activities.
Carmine Giardino, Nicolò Paternoster, M. Unterkalmsteiner et al.· IEEE Transactions on Softwar...· 178 citations· ⚡14
Software startup companies develop innovative, software-intensive products within limited timeframes and with few resources, searching for sustainable and scalable business models.
M. Unterkalmsteiner, P. Abrahamsson, Xiaofeng Wang et al.· e-Informatica Software Engin...· 157 citations· ⚡17
This study conducts a case survey study based on the secondary data of the major pivots happened in 49 software startups, and demonstrates that customer need pivot is the most common among all pivot types.
Sohaib Shahid Bajwa, Xiaofeng Wang, Anh Nguyen-Duc et al.· Empirical Software Engineeri...· 127 citations· ⚡15
The comparison of adopter and non-adopter sample reveals three potential adoption inhibitor, security, data privacy, and portability, which underlines the importance of the technical and security perspectives for research investigating the adoption of technology.
Nattakarn Phaphoom, Xiaofeng Wang, S. Samuel et al.· Journal of Systems and Softw...· 111 citations· ⚡8
This study investigates how Lean internal startup facilitates software product innovation in large companies and identifies its enablers and inhibitors, and shows the potential of the method-in-action framework to investigate the Lean startup approach in non-startup context.
Henry Edison, Nina M. Smørsgård, Xiaofeng Wang et al.· Journal of Systems and Softw...· 78 citations· ⚡6
Related blog posts
Microsoft Research Blog· microsoft.comOct 12, 2026
StudentSim is a research system for evaluating and improving AI tutoring tools before they are tested with learners. It models how individuals may engage with tutors, giving feedback to improve tutor performance across subjects like chess, writing, and mathematics. The post Simulating student learning for better AI tutoring appeared first on Microsoft Research.