Skip to content

Emotional AI 's Psychological Threat to Consumers: A Framework and Research Agenda

Sep 2026 · Journal of Consumer Behaviour · 0 citations · 50 references
AI in Service Interactions

TL;DR

The Framework for Emotional AI Risk (FEAR) Matrix is introduced, which categorizes EAI's psychological threats along two dimensions: Pathways of Harm (mind‐driven vs system‐driven) and Scope of Impact (individual, relational, and cumulative).

Abstract

Emotional artificial intelligence (EAI) is transforming how consumers interact with digital systems by detecting, interpreting, and responding to human emotions. While these capabilities can enhance personalization and engagement, they also create underexplored psychological risks. To address this concern, we introduce the Framework for Emotional AI Risk (FEAR) Matrix, which categorizes EAI's psychological threats along two dimensions: Pathways of Harm (mind‐driven vs. system‐driven) and Scope of Impact (individual, relational, and cumulative). Intersecting these dimensions yields six distinct threat types: Emotional Overload, Anxiety and Powerlessness, Emotional Intrusion, Dependency and Isolation, Emotional Desensitization, and Cumulative Disengagement. The framework draws on cognitive load theory, self‐determination theory, and social impact theory to explain how EAI can erode well‐being through overstimulation, loss of autonomy, blurred identity boundaries, disrupted relationships, and diminished trust. The FEAR Matrix advances prior AI–consumer research by providing a psychologically grounded, EAI‐specific structure for identifying how emotional harms emerge, differ in scope, and potentially accumulate over time. We also propose industry and policy interventions designed to enhance transparency, preserve consumer control, and mitigate these psychological risks. Together, these contributions provide researchers, marketers, and policymakers with a framework for understanding and responsibly managing the psychological consequences of EAI.

View source

Similar papers

#human-computer interacti... Preprint Sep 2026

Beyond Benefit or Risk: Perceived Impact Profiles of Human-AI Affective Interaction and Their Associations with Psychological Functioning

Relational AI increasingly serves as an emotional shelter for humans, and its impact is mixed. Prior research has focused on either positive or negative impacts, leaving unclear how they are configured within individuals and relate to psychological functioning. To address these gaps, this study used a sequential mixed-...

Lu Chen, Feng-Hua Tang, Jia-Yu Zhao et al. · 0 citations
Open access 2026

Conceptualizing AI-Related Career Anxiety: An Integrated Counseling Psychology Framework

: Artificial intelligence (AI) is transforming contemporary workplaces and generating new forms of career uncertainty. AI-related career anxiety has emerged as a psychological concern as individuals face changing work demands. Existing studies have primarily explained AI-related career anxiety as a direct response to t...

Yu Liu · 0 citations
Open access Aug 2026

Navigating Consumer Emotional Vulnerability in Services

The growing awareness that consumer vulnerability extends beyond a person’s fixed status or identity is prompting concern to better understand the overlooked lived experiences of vulnerability that are under-theorized, poorly accommodated, and potentially harmful. We take the cascading mental health crises around the w...

Elizabeth A. Minton, Frank G. Cabano, C. Blocker et al. · 0 citations
Open access 2026

University Students’ Perceptions of AI-Mediated Psychological Support: A Thematic Analysis of Empathy, Utility, Ethics, and Digital Well-Being

The growing use of generative artificial intelligence in higher education has created new ways for students to learn and access support. At the same time, it has raised concerns about students turning to AI for emotional and psychological help. This study explores how undergraduate students perceive and use AI as a sou...

Adryan Valiao · 0 citations
Preprint Aug 2026

From Substitution to Scaffolding: Breaking the Self-Reinforcing Harm Cycle of AI in Education (and Beyond)

An integrative framework of four interrelated dimensions -cognition, agency, emotional well-being, and ethics- linked by a self-reinforcing cycle where cognitive offloading reduces effort, weakens agency, and compounds emotional and ethical harm is organized.

Lucile Favero, J. A. Pérez-Ortiz, Tanja Käser et al. · 0 citations

Related blog posts

Microsoft Research Blog Oct 12, 2026

Simulating student learning for better AI tutoring

StudentSim is a research system for evaluating and improving AI tutoring tools before they are tested with learners. It models how individuals may engage with tutors, giving feedback to improve tutor performance across subjects like chess, writing, and mathematics. The post Simulating student learning for better AI tutoring appeared first on Microsoft Research.

GPT-Lab Oct 12, 2026

AI Has Grown Up. Have We?

AI is moving beyond impressive demos. After World Summit AI 2026 in Amsterdam, GPT-Lab's Muhammad Waseem reflects on what organizations need to make AI agents reliable, responsible and genuinely useful in everyday work. The post AI Has Grown Up. Have We? appeared first on GPT-Lab.

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.