Skip to content

AI-Driven Dynamic Pricing and Advertising in E-Commerce Competition: A Differential Game Analysis of Coordination Reversal and Welfare

Sep 2026 · Journal of Global Social Transformation · Vol 2, pp. 183-199 · 0 citations · 9 references
Consumer Market Behavior and Pricing

TL;DR

The framework provides an analytical characterization of a mechanism that can generate the lower-price coordination outcome reported in recent computational research, clarifying conditions under which multidimensional coordination can be associated with consumer-beneficial rather than purely anticompetitive outcomes.

Abstract

This paper develops a continuous-time differential game to examine how artificial intelligence shapes strategic pricing and advertising competition among e-commerce sellers. Building on recent reinforcement-learning evidence of counterintuitive lower-price outcomes under consumer search responsiveness, the analysis incorporates AI capability through demand sensitivity and advertising effectiveness within a Nerlove-Arrow (1962) goodwill framework. A closed-form coordination-reversal condition is derived in a static-goodwill benchmark, showing that coordinated equilibrium prices fall below non-cooperative Nash equilibrium prices if and only if the advertising-spillover effect dominates the cross-price substitution effect. The mechanism is then embedded in a continuous-time differential game with endogenous goodwill, and the feedback Nash equilibrium conditions are formulated through a coupled Hamilton-Jacobi-Bellman system. In the static benchmark, higher AI capability is shown to expand the parameter region supporting lower prices under coordination through the advertising-effectiveness channel. Welfare analysis reveals that lower prices do not automatically guarantee higher consumer surplus when advertising and goodwill adjust; the exact demand condition for consumer-surplus improvement is derived. The framework provides an analytical characterization of a mechanism that can generate the lower-price coordination outcome reported in recent computational research, clarifying conditions under which multidimensional coordination can be associated with consumer-beneficial rather than purely anticompetitive outcomes.

Read PDF

Similar papers

#machine learning Review Open access Oct 2014

Software development in startup companies: A systematic mapping study

The results indicate that software engineering work practices are chosen opportunistically, adapted and configured to provide value under the constrains imposed by the startup context.

Nicolò Paternoster, Carmine Giardino, M. Unterkalmsteiner et al. · 394 citations · ⚡54
#machine learning Review Open access Jun 2014

Why Early-Stage Software Startups Fail: A Behavioral Framework

This state-of-practice investigation was performed using a literature review followed by a multiple-case study approach and presents how inconsistency between managerial strategies and execution can lead to failure by means of a behavioral framework.

Carmine Giardino, Xiaofeng Wang, P. Abrahamsson · 175 citations · ⚡19
#machine learning Review Open access Oct 2016

“Failures” to be celebrated: an analysis of major pivots of software startups

This study conducts a case survey study based on the secondary data of the major pivots happened in 49 software startups, and demonstrates that customer need pivot is the most common among all pivot types.

Sohaib Shahid Bajwa, Xiaofeng Wang, Anh Nguyen-Duc et al. · 127 citations · ⚡15
#machine learning Review Open access May 2016

Key Challenges in Software Startups Across Life Cycle Stages

It is found that what perceived as biggest challenges by software startups do vary across different life cycle stages, even though its significance decreases when the learning focuses of the startups move from problem to solution and their products mature.

Xiaofeng Wang, Henry Edison, Sohaib Shahid Bajwa et al. · 62 citations · ⚡6

Related blog posts

Microsoft Research Blog Oct 12, 2026

Simulating student learning for better AI tutoring

StudentSim is a research system for evaluating and improving AI tutoring tools before they are tested with learners. It models how individuals may engage with tutors, giving feedback to improve tutor performance across subjects like chess, writing, and mathematics. The post Simulating student learning for better AI tutoring appeared first on Microsoft Research.

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.