Sep 2026· Management in Education· 0 citations· 35 references
TL;DR
This qualitative phenomenological study explores how Kuwaiti public school principals understand and anticipate their responsibilities regarding AI-use in schools and foregrounding principals’ ethical reasoning in a Gulf Region context and offers implications for leadership preparation, policy development, and responsible AI educational integration.
Abstract
Artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly reshaping educational leadership and management, yet little is known about how school principals conceptualize personal ethical and legal responsibilities in AI-driven contexts. Drawing upon ethical leadership theory, UNESCO’s ethical AI framework, and digital transformation literature, this qualitative phenomenological study explores how Kuwaiti public school principals understand and anticipate their responsibilities regarding AI-use in schools. Semistructured interviews with 26 principals across primary, intermediate, and secondary public schools took place. Thematic analysis revealed two interrelated themes: (a) ethical concerns and commitments, including data-privacy, fairness, transparency, academic integrity, and preservation of human judgment; and (b) legal uncertainty and a policy vacuum, characterized by nonexistent formal guidance, liability fears, limited AI literacy, and infrastructural constraints. Principals positioned themselves as moral guardians navigating AI-adoption cautiously in a highly-centralized education system, while calling for culturallyresponsive policies, professional development, and clearer governance frameworks. The study contributes empirically to emerging scholarship on AI-driven school leadership by foregrounding principals’ ethical reasoning in a Gulf Region context and offers implications for leadership preparation, policy development, and responsible AI educational integration
The study generated the framework Contextualizing Responsible AI Governance Through Adaptive School Leadership, which explains responsible AI governance as a continuing process of policy interpretation, contextual adaptation, institutional capacity building, ethical accountability, and stakeholder collaboration.
Venz Mae Siodo· QualiSearch Journal of Educa...· 0 citations
The model proposes that neither competency alone is sufficient for responsible AI practice and that their combination enables public relations professionals to advocate not only for organizational publics, but for humanity as the emergent public of the AI age.
This study explores how educational institutions in the Philippines address the challenges posed by artificial intelligence (AI) in maintaining academic integrity. Using qualitative document analysis, purposively selected institutional policies, guidelines, and ethical frameworks were examined to identify prevailing ap...
Precila Jabagat, Benedict V. Omblero, Esthrer-Rose Gabonada et al.· Psychology and Education: A...· 0 citations
The Ethico-Regulatory Governance (ERG) Framework is proposed, a conceptual model designed to bridge global ethics with local compliance, and offers a scalable, adaptable solution for universities navigating the complexities of GenAI.
Christian Roberto Cabezas Freire, Nayana Desai· Revista Hambatu Science· 0 citations
A six-element governance framework is developed comprising legitimate purpose and proportionality; explicit allocation of roles and responsibility; traceable data, evidence, and uncertainty; competent human oversight and calibrated reliance; stakeholder participation, contestability, and redress; and continuous monitor...
This article develops a competency-based framework for the moral and ethical education
of internal affairs personnel. It addresses a practical problem: codes of conduct and periodic
educational events can define expected behaviour, but they do not by themselves ensure sound
judgment in situations involving discretion,...