The Ethico-Regulatory Governance (ERG) Framework is proposed, a conceptual model designed to bridge global ethics with local compliance, and offers a scalable, adaptable solution for universities navigating the complexities of GenAI.
Abstract
The rapid adoption of generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) in higher education has outpaced institutional readiness, creating urgent ethical and regulatory challenges that threaten academic integrity, data privacy, and educational equity. While global frameworks like UNESCO’s Guidance for Generative AI in Education (2023) advocate for human-centric design, and national laws such as FERPA mandate student data protection, no existing model systematically integrates these domains into a cohesive governance structure. This study addresses this critical gap by proposing the Ethico-Regulatory Governance (ERG) Framework, a conceptual model designed to bridge global ethics with local compliance. Developed through a systematic synthesis of 68 peer-reviewed studies, policy documents, and institutional guidelines, the ERG Framework consists of four interlocking layers: Foundational Principles (UNESCO values), Regulatory Anchors (FERPA/GDPR alignment), Institutional Mechanisms (audits, disclosure, training), and Pedagogical Integration (process-based assessment, prompt engineering). The framework transforms abstract principles into actionable practices, enabling institutions to move beyond reactive policies toward proactive, accountable governance. Key findings demonstrate that effective AI integration requires not only technical oversight but also stakeholder co-design, bias mitigation, and continuous feedback loops. By operationalizing ethics through enforceable mechanisms, the ERG Framework offers a scalable, adaptable solution for universities navigating the complexities of GenAI. Its implementation can safeguard core academic values while fostering innovation, ensuring that AI serves as a partner—not a replacement—for human judgment in teaching, learning, and research.
The Ethico-Regulatory Governance (ERG) Framework is proposed, a conceptual model designed to bridge global ethics with local compliance, and offers a scalable, adaptable solution for universities navigating the complexities of GenAI.
The proposed GenAI Responsible Adoption Framework for Vietnamese Higher Education (GRAV-HE) comprises four interdependent dimensions: ethical policy and AI disclosure, data governance and secure infrastructure, pedagogical transformation, and comprehensive AI literacy.
N. Dương, T. Từ, L. Dang et al.· OIDA International Journal o...· 0 citations
Generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) systems are increasingly embedded in higher education, shaping writing, instructional design, and institutional approaches to academic integrity. In response, universities have developed policies, ethical guidelines, and detection tools; however, most approaches frame governance primarily as compliance—focusing on technical reliability, permissible use, and policy enforcement—while neglecting users’ moral agency, cognitive engagement, and responsibility. This perspective article introduces the TPPP Nexus, an interdisciplinary framework integrating Technology, Pedagogy, Philosophy, and Psychology as the normative and cognitive foundation for GenAI governance in higher education. Integrating insights from virtue ethics and moral philosophy, as well as cognitive and motivational psychology, the framework reconceptualizes governance as an emergent, human-centered practice shaped by ethical reasoning and human behavior, rather than by algorithmic sophistication or instructional design alone. Technology enables GenAI use, pedagogy guides everyday academic application, philosophy grounds ethical judgment and responsibility, and psychology illuminates cognition, motivation, and agency in human–GenAI interaction. The TPPP Nexus demonstrates that ethical GenAI governance should go beyond policy compliance and detection tools to cultivate reflection, intellectual integrity, and ethical resilience among learners and educators. By advancing a human-centered, interdisciplinary model, this perspective invites higher education to approach GenAI governance not only as institutional oversight but as a shared moral and educational responsibility that fosters human flourishing in the age of GenAI.
M. Uddin· Discover Artificial Intellig...· 0 citations
A six-element governance framework is developed comprising legitimate purpose and proportionality; explicit allocation of roles and responsibility; traceable data, evidence, and uncertainty; competent human oversight and calibrated reliance; stakeholder participation, contestability, and redress; and continuous monitoring, audit, and institutional learning.
Examination of the legal and ethical perspectives of use of generative AI in academic backgrounds through a doctrinal and thematic analysis of recent scholarship, institutional guidance and evolving governing instruments concludes that transparent disclosure frameworks, redesigned assessment practices and layered governance models offer a more secure path forward.
Unknown authors· Revue Internationale du Law...· 0 citations
By reframing GenAI adoption as a sociotechnical design-and-governance problem rather than tool uptake, RAiLE offers a pathway for building plural, accountable, and agency-preserving futures for language education.
Ali Khodi, Samantha M. Curle· Frontiers in Education· 1 citation
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.