Skip to content
Open access

RETHINKING LEARNING IN THE AI ERA: THE AIAS FRAMEWORK FOR REFLECTIVE HIGHER EDUCATION

Jul 2026 · PUPIL International Journal of Teaching Education and Learning · 0 citations

TL;DR

The research outcomes demonstrate that AIAS functions effectively as a learning architecture, aligning academic integrity with instructional design, and offers a replicable model for fashion programs and other disciplines seeking responsible AI integration.

Abstract

The rapid growth of generative Artificial Intelligence (AI) is reshaping how higher education conceptualizes learning, assessment, and pedagogy. Many institutions respond by relying on restrictive policies. Unfortunately, this approach often fails to support meaningful and sustainable education. The objective of this study is to reinterpret the Artificial Intelligence Assessment Scale (AIAS) (Perkins et al., 2024) as a developmental pedagogical framework that enables transparent, ethical, and reflective integration of AI into teaching and learning. Methodologically, the study applies the five-level AIAS model, ranging from AI prohibition to full AI collaboration, in FASH 137: Clothing, Society, and Culture, a General Education course examining the sociocultural meanings of dress. AI integration is scaffolded across multiple assignments, each explicitly aligned with a designated AIAS level. Data are drawn from assignment design, faculty observations, and structured student reflections documenting AI use and learning outcomes. Findings reveal three interrelated pedagogical themes. First, transparency as pedagogical integrity emerges through required “AI Use Notes,” which normalize disclosure and foster academic trust. Second, critical evaluation as human distinction is strengthened as students compare AI-generated insights with their own analyses, reinforcing judgment, creativity, and cultural interpretation. Third, AI as a structured learning partner supports exploration, critique, writing development, and identity reflection without replacing human authorship. The research outcomes demonstrate that AIAS functions effectively as a learning architecture, aligning academic integrity with instructional design. The framework offers a replicable model for fashion programs and other disciplines seeking responsible AI integration. Future research will expand empirical assessment across courses, disciplines, and institutions, examine longitudinal learning impacts, and refine discipline-specific AIAS applications to guide higher education in the AI-driven future.

Read PDF

Similar papers

Review Open access Aug 2026

Posthuman Learning in the Age of AI: Rethinking Agency, Knowledge, and Policy in Architectural Education

A policy-oriented posthuman framework for interpreting AI integration in architectural pedagogy and translating it into responsible design education principles is developed, which clarifies the theoretical relevance of posthuman pedagogy for AI-supported architectural education.

Ha-Kan Tong, Ayşegül Kıdık, Sema Alaçam · 0 citations
Review Open access Jul 2026

RETHINKING ASSESSMENT: DIFFERENTIATED INSTRUCTION IN THE AI ERA

This article re-examines the role of assessment within the rapidly evolving landscape of artificial intelligence (AI), focusing specifically on differentiated instruction, and highlights the potential of AI to not only streamline the assessment process but also cultivate a more equitable and student-centered learning e...

H. Trinh · 0 citations
Open access Aug 2026

Scaling Complex Thinking: A Conceptual Framework for AI-Supported Inquiry-Based Learning

A holistic framework that integrates inquiry-based learning (IBL) with artificial intelligence (AI) to support learning is proposed, arguing that the sustainability of such a system depends on shifting assessment from content mastery to measurable complex thinking skills.

Lori B. Doyle, Jill L. Swisher · 0 citations
Review Open access Jul 2026

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN DIGITAL LEARNING AND EDUCATION: A SYSTEMATIC LITERATURE REVIEW

Results indicate that AI literacy and perceived opportunities consistently predict acceptance and adoption, that anxiety and trust/transparency perceptions act as critical psychological mediators, and that sustainability and organizational-culture factors increasingly shape institutional AI adoption beyond the individu...

Bhawna · 0 citations
Review Open access Jul 2026

Navigating generative AI in higher education: Freshers’ perceptions of ethics in AI, digital learning behavior, and institutional norms

First-year university students’ perceptions of generative AI in academic work are investigated, foregrounding student agency in a Global South context and offering pedagogical and policy implications for responsible AI adoption.

Sharifuzzaman, M. Rahman · 0 citations
Review Open access Jul 2026

Harnessing AI in Education for Sustainable Development: The Interplay of AI-Supported Blended Learning, Student Self-Regulation, and Cognitive Load

Findings show that the use of AImediates the relationship between DT and students’ behavioural and academic outcomes, and shows that the use of AI helps shape student experiences and outcomes.

N. Shaya, Rawan Abukhait, Muhammad Nisar Khattak et al. · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.