ETHOS (Ethics and Trust through Hierarchical Oversight System), a modular ethics framework designed as a governance meta-agent that can be integrated with any existing multi-agent system without requiring changes to its underlying architecture, is presented.
Abstract
The rapid adoption of large language models has enabled the development of clinical multi-agent systems (MAS) capable of integrating multimodal patient data and supporting increasingly complex clinical decision-making. However, the deployment of these systems in real-world healthcare settings raises critical ethical concerns related to safety, fairness, accountability, transparency, and patient trust. While numerous organizations, including the World Health Organization, the National Academy of Medicine, and the FUTURE-AI consortium, have proposed ethical frameworks and governance principles for healthcare AI, these efforts remain largely conceptual. To address this challenge, we present ETHOS (Ethics and Trust through Hierarchical Oversight System), a modular ethics framework designed as a governance meta-agent that can be integrated with any existing multi-agent system without requiring changes to its underlying architecture. ETHOS translates stakeholder-informed ethical requirements into executable runtime oversight through a layered governance approach consisting of deterministic checks, contextual reviews, and a final ethics critic. These components continuously evaluate intermediate reasoning steps and final outputs, enabling the system to identify ethical risks, request revisions, or suppress responses that fail predefined safety and trustworthiness criteria. We demonstrate ETHOS within a hepatology clinical decision-support MAS. Results show that ETHOS improves decision reliability by detecting incomplete, inconsistent, or out-of-scope evidence and appropriately increasing abstention when safe recommendations cannot be supported. By embedding ethical governance directly into system operation, ETHOS provides a practical and auditable mechanism for transforming high-level AI ethics principles into deployable safeguards.
The proposed Lifecycle-Integrated Healthcare AI Governance Framework (LIHAG), a four-layer deployment-oriented governance model integrating technical robustness, ethical safeguards, regulatory compliance, regulatory compliance, and human oversight as interdependent dimensions of responsible AI deployment is proposed.
Shehu Mohammed, Neha Malhotra, Sourabh Kumar· AI and Ethics· 0 citations
This paper presents an empirically grounded study in radiology in Germany, conducted in collaboration with multiple stakeholders, such as ethicists, AI developers, clinicians, and HCI researchers via an ethical, legal, and social implications (ELSI) workshop and in-depth interviews, and proposes ten practice-centered e...
Nazmun Nisat Ontika, Sheree May Plinz-Saßmannshausen, Markus Rohde et al.· Proceedings of the 14th Nord...· 0 citations
Abstract Objective Artificial intelligence (AI) technologies are being rapidly adopted in healthcare, yet organisational governance often lacks the processes needed to oversee their safe and responsible use. Previous AI governance frameworks largely focus on high-level AI ethics principles, leaving healthcare organisat...
S. Freeman, Amy Wang, Sudeep Saraf et al.· BMJ digital health & AI· 0 citations
The integration of artificial intelligence (AI) into healthcare offers transformative potential for
improving patient outcomes, enhancing operational efficiency, and advancing medical
research. However, the adoption of AI in healthcare also introduces significant ethical and
legal challenges, particularly in ensuring c...
Grace Annie Chintoh· International Journal of Hea...· 1 citation
A Multi-Layer Social-Theoretical AI Ethics Framework (MLST-AEF) that integrates normative ethical reasoning, stakeholder analysis, institutional context, bias and power assessment, and structured decision support is developed.
M. Fakrudeen, J. Otieno· AI and Ethics· 0 citations
The evidence shows strong convergence around fairness, transparency, privacy, accountability, human oversight, safety and inclusiveness, but weaker agreement on implementation, and an integrated framework for developing, deploying and monitoring AI systems in ways that are lawful, transparent, accountable, inclusive an...
Sunday Olusola Ladipo, Ifaka Queen Inazu· Direct Research Journal of E...· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.