This paper introduces Agent-Integrated Software (AIS) as a software pattern combining a conventional core, direct interaction, and a built-in agent, and Intent-Level Interaction Abstraction (IIA) as the task semantics through which users inspect and control delegated work.
Abstract
Embedding an intelligent agent in an existing application creates a persistent coordination problem: users can revise goals and manipulate shared objects while delegated execution continues. We argue that dependable integration requires an explicit correspondence between task-level interaction and application behavior. We introduce Agent-Integrated Software (AIS) as a software pattern combining a conventional core, direct interaction, and a built-in agent, and Intent-Level Interaction Abstraction (IIA) as the task semantics through which users inspect and control delegated work. An open transition-system model relates AIS execution to IIA states and events. Interaction contracts constrain this relation through task bindings, role-specific authority, control transitions, and outcome evidence; continuous assurance maintains scoped claims as their dependencies change. A compact disclosure contract and conditional propositions illustrate why local component validity is insufficient and how selected admission invariants can be separated from planning. Contrasting software domains expose the framework's assumptions and limits. This perspective develops a research agenda spanning application abstraction, development support, controlled execution, quality assessment, and human supervision, with the aim of making agent integration a maintainable software engineering discipline.
A contract-bounded runtime architecture, a source-preserving data substrate, and a falsifiable measurement protocol are contributed, which proposes a cluster-period randomized crossover experiment with a four-state verdict: supported, falsified, conditional-engineering, or inconclusive.
Ya-Xiao Liu, Peng Liu, Yi-Wen Liu et al.· 0 citations
These results demonstrate DCCs as a reusable semantic foundation for agent autonomy across heterogeneous devices, unifying capability-based planning, evidence-grounded execution, and authorized recovery within one architecture.
Xue-Chun Li, Jia-Xin Liang, Jie Li et al.· 0 citations
A policy algebra is proposed that defines the reliability envelope within which agent capability may be exercised and provides researchers and practitioners with formal correctness conditions, executable decision semantics, and trace evidence for building agents that are not only capable, but reliably capable.
Bhaskar Tripathi, Anurag Kumar, R. Kumar et al.· 0 citations
MAGE explains how externalized knowledge, bounded action, independent evaluation, and retained human authority can compose into a governed engineering environment, and proposes tests of when that environment turns commodity intelligence into durable engineering progress.
James C. Davis, Kelechi G. Kalu, Hui-Yun Peng et al.· 2 citations
This work makes that authority an explicit classification axis and derive consequences for change state, shared engineering facts, verification, and flow control and makes that authority an explicit classification axis and derive consequences for change state, shared engineering facts, verification, and flow control.
OpenAgentFlow is presented, a control-plane/action-plane architecture that establishes the action-commit boundary as a shared enforcement interface and shows that a shared action-commit boundary provides a practical basis for system-wide governance across heterogeneous agent execution paths.
Dong-Sheng Chen, Xiang-Yu Zhao, Xin Yao et al.· 0 citations