A unified view of progress reward modeling for robotic learning is provided in three connected steps that connect what a progress model is, how it is built, and how its quality is validated.
Abstract
Robotic learning takes place in dynamic environments with large behavior spaces. A terminal success signal only tells the robot whether the task is completed. It does not explain whether the current behavior is making progress, remaining unchanged, or undoing earlier progress. For this reason, recent studies have increasingly explored progress rewards that provide feedback during task execution. However, the current literature lacks a shared framework. Existing methods use different observations, goal specifications, output signals, supervision sources, and evaluation protocols. This makes it difficult to compare them and understand what their results actually validate. In this survey, we provide a unified view of progress reward modeling for robotic learning. We organize the field in three connected steps. We first study the interface of a progress model. This defines the problem from the outside by asking what information the model receives and what form of progress signal it produces. We then move inside the model and study the methods used to construct this signal. This reveals the different assumptions and mechanisms behind progress estimation and reward generation. Finally, we examine the data and benchmarks that support these methods. This shows how progress supervision is obtained and what different evaluations actually measure. Together, these three perspectives connect what a progress model is, how it is built, and how its quality is validated. We further summarize the main limitations of current approaches and discuss future research directions.
The Agentic Reward System (ARS) is introduced, an inference framework for progress reward modeling with general-purpose vision-language models (VLMs), without additional reward-model training, and its results suggest that structured inference and verification can improve the usefulness of general-purpose VLMs for robot...
Sheng-Miao Hu, Wei-Yi Lu, Ling-Bing Zeng et al.· 0 citations
Long-horizon agentic tasks require an agent to modify an environment through a sequence of tool calls, with success determined by the final state. The standard recipe assigns a single outcome reward at the end and compares trajectories sampled for the same task. As a result, a group with no successful trajectory yields...
This dissertation presents a work in safe RL, where agents must also respect safety constraints using pure-past linear-time temporal logic (PPLTL), and presents how to enforce safety constraints using pure-past linear-time temporal logic (PPLTL).
This work introduces eVTA, which learns success probabilities from mixed-quality policy rollouts through temporal-difference-style bootstrapping, without expert demonstrations or intermediate annotations, and introduces RL with Evolving Rewards (RLER), a closed-loop framework that adapts eVTA using newly collected roll...
Duo Wu, Hai-Feng Wang, Rongwei Lu et al.· 0 citations
A coherent map of the rapidly expanding landscape of visual RL is provided to provide researchers and practitioners with a coherent map of the rapidly expanding landscape of visual RL and to highlight promising directions for future inquiry.
Embodied agents now take on ever longer tasks. For long tasks, knowing only whether a task finally succeeds or fails says little; the steps along the way matter. Progress Reward Models (PRMs) score how far a task has come at every step, and serve as dense rewards, verifiers and monitors. Yet in long tasks the current f...
Jian-Shu Zhang, Ke-Liang Wu, Cheng-Xuan Qian et al.· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.