Robotic learning takes place in dynamic environments with large behavior spaces. A terminal success signal only tells the robot whether the task is completed. It does not explain whether the current behavior is making progress, remaining unchanged, or undoing earlier progress. For this reason, recent studies have increasingly explored progress rewards that provide feedback during task execution. However, the current literature lacks a shared framework. Existing methods use different observations, goal specifications, output signals, supervision sources, and evaluation protocols. This makes it difficult to compare them and understand what their results actually validate. In this survey, we provide a unified view of progress reward modeling for robotic learning. We organize the field in three connected steps. We first study the interface of a progress model. This defines the problem from the outside by asking what information the model receives and what form of progress signal it produces. We then move inside the model and study the methods used to construct this signal. This reveals the different assumptions and mechanisms behind progress estimation and reward generation. Finally, we examine the data and benchmarks that support these methods. This shows how progress supervision is obtained and what different evaluations actually measure. Together, these three perspectives connect what a progress model is, how it is built, and how its quality is validated. We further summarize the main limitations of current approaches and discuss future research directions.
Jianshu Zhang, Keliang Wu, Haoran Lu et al.· arXiv.org· 1 citation
Specializing Large Language Models (LLMs) toward distinct abilities underpins successes ranging from personalized assistants to multi-agent systems (MAS). Single-agent paradigms rely on pre-defined personas or steering vectors to induce specialization, yet they impose a single fixed specialization that fails to adapt to diverse queries. Conversely, MAS achieves dynamic multi-perspective problem solving by orchestrating agents with distinct text-based roles, but fusing these specializations requires multi-turn interactions that inflate context length and inference cost. To address these limitations, we propose Mixture of Roles (MoRe), which adaptively composes multiple specializations into a single steering vector for single-turn inference. Specifically, MoRe learns a diversified codeboox of steering vectors, each of which encodes a latent role. A query-aware router dynamically fuses the codebook into a steering vector that encompasses multiple roles. By steering the backbone LLM with the composed vector, MoRe enables multi-perspective specialization in a single-agent, single-turn inference process. The proposed MoRe can be efficiently trained via a three-stage SFT curriculum and GRPO post-training, while the backbone LLM remains frozen. Experiments across reasoning and personality benchmarks show that MoRe outperforms single-agent baselines by 2.2% on average, and achieves performance on par with MAS while reducing token cost by 20x.
Zhichen Zeng, Huiyuan Chen, Jingru Cheng et al.· 0 citations
This paper proposes World Model RL (WMRL), which replaces environment execution with a world model to remove this bottleneck and accelerates training by 3-4x on various tasks at different agent scales, while exceeding the performance of standard RL baselines.
Xi-Yuan Yang, S. Sarwar, Jingru Cheng et al.· 0 citations
This work proposes a principled VLM TTA method called \algname, and theoretically reveals that the InfoNCE loss can be neatly reformulated as a Wasserstein OT formulation, thereby unifying the objectives of the inference and adaptation of VLMs to achieve their mutual benefits.
Qi Yu, Zhichen Zeng, Katherine Tieu et al.· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.
