Skip to content

Accurate and explainable ICD-10-CM diagnosis coding through multi-stage model adaptation and evidence-guided verification

Sep 2026 · PeerJ Computer Science · 35 references
Medical Coding and Health Information

Abstract

The International Classification of Diseases (ICD) coding system is central to reimbursement, registry construction, and secondary analysis, yet automated inpatient International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-10-CM) diagnosis coding from discharge documentation remains difficult because clinical notes are long, diagnoses are multi-label, and supporting evidence is often scattered across multiple note sections. Existing systems also provide limited justification for why a code was assigned. This study develops and evaluates a Large Language Model (LLM)-based approach for accurate and evidence-grounded ICD-10-CM coding. Our framework combines three components: a two-stage Supervised Fine-Tuning (SFT) strategy that first aligns the base model with medical instructions and then specializes it for ICD coding, an ICD-aligned Reinforcement Learning (RL) algorithm with reward and advantage functions tailored to the hierarchical structure of ICD codes, and a Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG)-based verifier that removes predictions lacking external support. On the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care IV (MIMIC-IV) benchmark, two-stage SFT improves Micro-F1 from 14.4% to 64.0%, ICD-specific RL further raises it to 66.7%, and the verifier reaches 67.5%, exceeding the strongest previously reported MIMIC-IV result by 8.8 points. These results show that domain adaptation, task-aligned optimization, and evidence-guided verification can improve both coding accuracy and the auditability of model outputs. The resulting system is intended as a decision-support tool for professional coders rather than a fully autonomous deployment.

View source

Similar papers

#machine learning Review Open access Oct 2014

Software development in startup companies: A systematic mapping study

The results indicate that software engineering work practices are chosen opportunistically, adapted and configured to provide value under the constrains imposed by the startup context.

Nicolò Paternoster, Carmine Giardino, M. Unterkalmsteiner et al. · 394 citations · ⚡54
#machine learning Review Open access Jun 2014

Why Early-Stage Software Startups Fail: A Behavioral Framework

This state-of-practice investigation was performed using a literature review followed by a multiple-case study approach and presents how inconsistency between managerial strategies and execution can lead to failure by means of a behavioral framework.

Carmine Giardino, Xiaofeng Wang, P. Abrahamsson · 175 citations · ⚡19
#machine learning Review Open access Oct 2016

“Failures” to be celebrated: an analysis of major pivots of software startups

This study conducts a case survey study based on the secondary data of the major pivots happened in 49 software startups, and demonstrates that customer need pivot is the most common among all pivot types.

Sohaib Shahid Bajwa, Xiaofeng Wang, Anh Nguyen-Duc et al. · 127 citations · ⚡15
#machine learning Review Open access May 2016

Key Challenges in Software Startups Across Life Cycle Stages

It is found that what perceived as biggest challenges by software startups do vary across different life cycle stages, even though its significance decreases when the learning focuses of the startups move from problem to solution and their products mature.

Xiaofeng Wang, Henry Edison, Sohaib Shahid Bajwa et al. · 62 citations · ⚡6

Related blog posts

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.