The molecular attributes acquired at each stage of PF production and the epitope changes originating during processing are explored, the current assessment scheme is reevaluated, and considerations for a premarket safety framework reflecting realistic processing and consumption conditions are outlined.
Abstract
Precision fermentation (PF) yields single, well-characterized recombinant proteins, such as dairy and egg white proteins, at an industrial scale, and several products have reached the market. Numerous PF-derived proteins, including ovomucoid and β-lactoglobulin, are known allergens designed as exact structural copies of their native homologs; hence, assessments center on equivalence rather than novel hazards. Therefore, the current tiered scheme of allergen database comparison, digestibility testing, and serum immunoglobulin E binding assays is applicable. Nevertheless, residual host cell proteins, altered host-dependent enzymatic glycosylation, and process-related impurities render PF-derived products imperfect replicas, and thermal and high-pressure processing, enzymatic hydrolysis, and non-enzymatic glycation can modify linear or conformational epitopes, thereby reducing IgE binding or generating neoepitopes. Because these effects depend on structural attributes acquired during production, including folding stability, disulfide bonding, glycosylation, and proteolytic resistance, PF-derived proteins and native proteins may respond differently to identical processing. This review explores the molecular attributes acquired at each stage of PF production and the epitope changes originating during processing, reevaluates the current assessment scheme, and outlines considerations for a premarket safety framework reflecting realistic processing and consumption conditions.
The comparison of adopter and non-adopter sample reveals three potential adoption inhibitor, security, data privacy, and portability, which underlines the importance of the technical and security perspectives for research investigating the adoption of technology.
Nattakarn Phaphoom, Xiaofeng Wang, S. Samuel et al.· Journal of Systems and Softw...· 111 citations· ⚡8
This study investigates how Lean internal startup facilitates software product innovation in large companies and identifies its enablers and inhibitors, and shows the potential of the method-in-action framework to investigate the Lean startup approach in non-startup context.
Henry Edison, Nina M. Smørsgård, Xiaofeng Wang et al.· Journal of Systems and Softw...· 78 citations· ⚡6
This paper highlights the challenges to conduct proper affect-related studies with psychology, provides a comprehensive literature review in affect theory, and proposes guidelines for conducting psychoempirical software engineering.
D. Graziotin, Xiaofeng Wang, P. Abrahamsson· SSE@SIGSOFT FSE· 56 citations· ⚡4
This study conducts a multiple case study on twenty European software startups and proposes a prototype-centric learning model in early stage software startups, and identifies factors that occur as barriers but also facilitators for prototyping in earlystage software startups.
Anh Nguyen-Duc, Xiaofeng Wang, P. Abrahamsson· International Conference on...· 44 citations· ⚡5
It is demonstrated that linker-free PROTACs can outperform traditional designs, marking a paradigm shift in PROTAC development for targeted protein degradation.
Pinal, a 16-billion-parameter foundation model that produces protein candidates from natural-language functional descriptions, supports natural language as a high-level interface for candidate generation in protein design, enabling programmable exploration with reduced reliance on manually specified structural or sequence constraints.
A new machine-learning framework aims to improve the success rate of computational protein design while moving away from results that reproduce sequences found in nature.