Skip to content

The Platonic brain bridge hypothesis: human brain networks as an architectural prior for multimodal large language models

Sep 2026 · 0 citations · 68 references
Biology Computer Science

TL;DR

The Platonic brain bridge hypothesis is proposed: omni models, multimodal large language models that process video, audio and text jointly, converge on brain-like representations usable in both directions, and human brain organization is a usable architectural prior for multimodal large language models.

Abstract

Multimodal large language models predict brain activity, but brain alignment has been a measurement, not a design tool. We propose the Platonic brain bridge hypothesis: omni models, multimodal large language models that process video, audio and text jointly, converge on brain-like representations usable in both directions. From model to brain, brain-likeness of seven omni models is stable across participants, rises with every input channel in three bases, and our encoders lead the Algonauts 2025 out-of-distribution leaderboard. From brain to model, Brain-MoE fixes the expert partition of a frozen base to the seven networks of human cortex, trains experts on network-labelled Brain-AVQA questions, raises held-out accuracy in all 15 model-benchmark pairs by 6.42 percentage points on average and exceeds capacity-matched random experts in 14. Brain-Scope localizes the correspondence to sparse features whose removal weakens brain prediction. Human brain organization is therefore a usable architectural prior for multimodal large language models.

View source

Similar papers

#natural language process... Preprint Sep 2026

Cognitive Expert Language Models Better Align with the Corresponding Brain Systems

Large language models (LLMs) can predict human brain activity across a variety of brain regions during natural language comprehension. Typically, however, LLM-brain alignment is measured using one model for different regions of the brain, and then model performance is summarized across regions. This one-model-fits-all...

Zhivar Sourati, Meng-Hong Wu, Nona Ghazizadeh et al. · 0 citations
#artificial intelligence Preprint Sep 2026

Which Attention Heads are like the Human Head? Not the Ones that Compute

Alignment and causation dissociate: brain-aligned heads contribute to performance, but their removal is substantially less disruptive than removal of heads selected via attribution patching, and FV-ranked removal is substantially more disruptive than brain-ranked removal.

Christopher Pinier, Gustaw Opielka, Hannes Rosenbusch et al. · 0 citations
Open access Aug 2026

Quantifying Large Language Model Influence in Brain Computer Interface Communication for Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis

This retrospectively re-decoded 3,373 P300-speller selections from 47 people with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, reconstructing a neural posterior and combining it with 25 language priors ranging from 5-grams to 46.7-billion-parameter models to reveal how strongly a fused brain-computer interface decision depends on it...

A. Gorenshtein, M. Omar, E. Jia et al. · 1 citation
#artificial intelligence Preprint Oct 2026

CortexBridge: Cortical Alignment of EEG Montages for Foundation Models

Electroencephalography (EEG) foundation models are often pretrained with a fixed channel vocabulary or a limited set of montages, making transfer difficult when electrode layouts change. We propose CortexBridge, a lightweight adapter that combines EEG features with electrode and atlas coordinates to map arbitrary monta...

Jia-Zhen Hong, Xiao-Tian Zhou, Zi-Hao Ding et al. · 0 citations
Open access Aug 2026

Brain–Language Alignment During Naturalistic Reading and Its Disruption by Mind-Wandering

Encoding models offer a principled framework for linking computational representations of language to neural activity, but most electroencephalography (EEG) evidence for brain–language alignment comes from tightly controlled, word-by-word reading paradigms. Whether such alignment is detectable during naturalistic readi...

Haorui Sun, D. Jangraw · 0 citations

Related blog posts

MIT News · Artificial Intelligence Oct 28, 2026

Making machines that can listen

Professor Paris Smaragdis develops computers with superhuman hearing for applications like speech recognition, music understanding, and environmental monitoring.

MIT News · Artificial Intelligence Oct 23, 2026

Q&A: How AI came to model the “messy” human mind

Assistant Professor Benjamin Lindquist studies how engineers deliberately injected randomness into early AI, giving rise to deep-learning models that sometimes hallucinate.

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.