The rapidly expanding body of chemical literature contains physical data scattered across unstructured text and complex tables in thousands of publications. Translating this information into machine-readable formats is essential for training data-driven chemical models. The lack of uncertainty quantification in computationally extracted datasets makes manual extraction and curation still necessary. We here address this challenge and present an uncertainty-quantified data extraction pipeline. Our fully automated pipeline utilizes large language models (LLMs) to extract complex tabular and textual chemical data directly from scientific PDFs. We systematically assess several modern LLMs and document-to-text conversion frameworks. We benchmark the uncertainty in extracted data by comparison of our computationally extracted databases with large, existing databases on solubility that are manually curated. Our pipeline achieves between 93 and 79% of the literature contained data, with near-zero median log deviations for structurally matched rows and residual high-magnitude errors concentrated in a small subset of OCR, table-structure, unit-scaling, or reference-dataset discrepancies. We showcase the utility of our pipeline by deploying it to extract data from over 2,000 articles and generate BigMixSolDB, a comprehensive database on solubility in complex mixtures. BigMixSolDB comprises 280,273 solubility entries spanning single, binary, and ternary solvent systems. Our results demonstrate how integrated LLM-based pipelines can be used for literature data extraction that is comparable with manual curation. We envision that these frameworks can be used for large-scale, accurate extraction of literature data into datasets for machine learning applications
The results are packaged in the Greenfield Startup Model (GSM), which explains the priority of startups to release the product as quickly as possible, and the need to shorten time-to-market, by speeding up the development through low-precision engineering activities.
Carmine Giardino, Nicolò Paternoster, M. Unterkalmsteiner et al.· IEEE Transactions on Softwar...· 178 citations· ⚡14
Software startup companies develop innovative, software-intensive products within limited timeframes and with few resources, searching for sustainable and scalable business models.
M. Unterkalmsteiner, P. Abrahamsson, Xiaofeng Wang et al.· e-Informatica Software Engin...· 157 citations· ⚡17
This study conducts a case survey study based on the secondary data of the major pivots happened in 49 software startups, and demonstrates that customer need pivot is the most common among all pivot types.
Sohaib Shahid Bajwa, Xiaofeng Wang, Anh Nguyen-Duc et al.· Empirical Software Engineeri...· 127 citations· ⚡15
The comparison of adopter and non-adopter sample reveals three potential adoption inhibitor, security, data privacy, and portability, which underlines the importance of the technical and security perspectives for research investigating the adoption of technology.
Nattakarn Phaphoom, Xiaofeng Wang, S. Samuel et al.· Journal of Systems and Softw...· 111 citations· ⚡8
The ongoing work building a Raspberry Pi cluster consisting of 300 nodes is presented, with potential use cases being an inexpensive and green test bed for cloud computing research and a robust and mobile data center for operating in adverse environments.
P. Abrahamsson, S. Helmer, Nattakarn Phaphoom et al.· IEEE International Conferenc...· 110 citations· ⚡7
The results indicate that software developers are a slightly happy population, but the need for limiting the unhappiness of developers remains, and 219 factors representing causes of unhappiness while developing software are identified.
D. Graziotin, Fabian Fagerholm, Xiaofeng Wang et al.· International Conference on...· 84 citations· ⚡6
Related blog posts
MIT News · Artificial Intelligence· news.mit.eduSep 14, 2026
The “HardFlow” algorithm could help generative AI models produce high-quality outputs that obey strict requirements when “pretty close” doesn’t cut it.
AI may appear weightless, but every model depends on physical infrastructure. To understand responsible AI, we need to look beyond algorithms and consider the entire lifecycle of the hardware behind them. The post Responsible AI Must Consider Its Afterlife appeared first on GPT-Lab.