Skip to content

uFlowCSP: Crystal Structure Prediction using Mean flow generative models

Sep 2026 · 1 citation · 34 references
Physics Computer Science

Abstract

Crystal structure prediction (CSP) is fundamental to computational materials discovery. Generative models including CDVAE, DiffCSP, FlowMM, and CrystalFlow learn stable-crystal distributions directly, but diffusion and flow-matching inference requires tens to thousands of sequential network evaluations per candidate. We introduce uFlowCSP, a MeanFlow-based CSP model that learns the average, rather than instantaneous, probability-flow velocity. It generates a complete structure in one to five evaluations, delivering 5x-58x faster inference with equal or better performance. A chemistry- and symmetry-aware Transformer uses canonical atom ordering, global composition, and per-token chemistry embeddings. A coarse crystal-system token is used only during training; it provides additive gains, particularly improving space-group agreement despite being absent at inference, which remains formula-only. On MP-20 with 20 candidates per target, one step matches CrystalFlow (78.38% vs. 78.34%) with 100x fewer evaluations and about 10x lower wall-clock time. Five steps reach 83.64%, exceeding CrystalFlow (78.34% at 2,000 evaluations) and DiffCSP (77.93% at about 20,000), while using 20x fewer evaluations. uFlowCSP generates 10,000 structures in 0.39-1.31 minutes, versus 6.5 for CrystalFlow and 76.1 for DiffCSP. Under CSPBench's energy-ranked top-five structure-and-space-group criterion, five-step uFlowCSP reaches 72%/72%/65% structure, space-group, and consensus match rates. CrystalFlow reaches 78%/73%/68% at 100 steps but falls to 49%/32%/31% at five. Thus, uFlowCSP improves accuracy per network evaluation, not merely peak accuracy.

View source

Similar papers

#machine learning Preprint Sep 2026

Deep Generative Crystal Structure Prediction: A Benchmark Study and a Controlled Test of Prototype Dependence

Present generative CSP models function largely as implicit, softer-edged prototype libraries rather than genuinely de novo predictors, and enlarging this residual capacity, rather than aggregate match rate alone, is the central open problem.

Lai Wei, Rong-Zhi Dong, Ying Feng et al. · 1 citation
#graph neural networks Open access Sep 2026

Pformer: a plug-and-play periodicity-aware embedding for crystal property prediction

Predicting macroscopic properties of crystalline materials from atomic structure remains a central challenge in computational materials science. We introduce Pformer, a modular crystal representation framework built around a Fourier-inspired source encoder. The source model is trained by supervised scalar-property regr...

Te-Shu Yao, Yun-Fei Zhao, Jiajun Bie et al. · 0 citations
#machine learning Preprint Sep 2026

Riemannian Flow Models with Reinforcement Learning for Molecular Crystal Structure Prediction

Crystal structure governs material properties, making crystal structure prediction (CSP) a fundamental problem in materials science. Generative models are a promising approach for solving this problem, but the prevalence of polymorphism, coupled with large unit cells and complex packing geometry, makes the molecular CS...

T. Egg, Harry W. Sullivan, Maya M. Martirossyan et al. · 0 citations
Preprint Aug 2026

Packora: Systematic Design for Generative Molecular Crystal Structure Prediction

Packora is presented, a flow-based generative model for molecular CSP that jointly predicts atomic coordinates and the lattice from molecular graphs that outperforms the baselines on both structure generation and ranking benchmarks.

Nayoung Kim, Kiyoung Seong, Sungsoo Ahn · 0 citations
#artificial intelligence Preprint Oct 2026

PIT-GCL: Protein Interaction using Topological Graph Contrastive Learning

Protein binding prediction is central to target identification, therapeutic binder design, and large scale screening, yet remains challenging because binding depends on sequence, three dimensional geometry, and global structural organization. Recent folding models such as AlphaFold3 and Boltz-2 have substantially impro...

Jae Won Choi, Ryoonki Hong, Alan Liang et al. · 0 citations
#artificial intelligence Preprint Sep 2026

Where Should Physics Enter a Molecular Crystal Generator?

CrystAF is introduced, an all-atom crystal flow-map generation model, and CrystAF with the UMA interatomic potential is used to systematically study where physics should enter, suggesting a simple principle: learn reusable physical alignment into the generator, and reserve inference-time physics for residual constraint...

Hao-Cheng Tang, Jun-Mei Wang, Wen-Gong Jin · 0 citations

Related blog posts

MIT News · Artificial Intelligence Sep 29, 2026

Who we become when we talk to machines

Professor Sherry Turkle’s new book, “Artificial Intimacy,” offers a withering critique of chatbots and the antisocial dynamics she believes they encourage.

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.