Skip to content

Multi-Agent Agentic Graph Learning via Structural Signatures

Sep 2026 · 1 citation · 39 references
Computer Science

TL;DR

A multi-agent agentic graph learning framework that partitions the graph into communities and assigns an independent agent to each community for region-specific specialization and shows that MAAGL outperforms SOTA AGL methods.

Abstract

Agentic graph learning (AGL) has recently achieved promising results on graph reasoning tasks, where an agent powered by a large language model (LLM) sequentially samples the graph as evidence to support its final prediction. Existing methods either employ a single agent or orchestrate multiple role-based agents to reason and learn over the entire graph, but both essentially rely on a shared reasoning policy across different graph regions, which can be suboptimal for graphs with heterogeneous structural and semantic patterns. Inspired by the progress of multi-agent collaboration on complex reasoning tasks, a natural remedy is to let multiple agents own different memory and collaborate; however, applying this paradigm to graphs directly faces two challenges. First, existing AGL methods typically verbalize graph structures into natural-language descriptions for LLM agents, making the reasoning process sensitive to the ordering of structural information and thereby breaking the permutation-invariant nature of graphs. Second, incorporating increasingly large sampled neighborhoods leads to rapidly growing contexts. To address these challenges, this paper introduces a multi-agent agentic graph learning (i.e., MAAGL) framework. MAAGL partitions the graph into communities and assigns an independent agent to each community for region-specific specialization. MAAGL represents structural and semantic evidence separately. Structural evidence is summarized by a dynamically updated structural signature that is permutation-invariant and fixed in size, while semantic evidence is filtered to the top-k nodes ranked by relevance. Based on historical trajectories with similar signatures, agents estimate their confidence and trigger debate-style collaboration when needed. Extensive experiments on four benchmark datasets show that MAAGL outperforms SOTA AGL methods.

View source

Similar papers

#machine learning Preprint Sep 2026

GraphMAS: A Systematic Benchmark of Multi-Agent Coordination for Graph Learning

LLM-based multi-agent systems coordinate specialized reasoning through aggregation, interaction, and adaptive control, yet their potential for graph learning remains unexplored. Graph learning is a natural setting for such systems because useful evidence may arise from heterogeneous local, long-range, global structural...

Jia-Yi Yang, Yi-Fang Chen, Yuan-Fu Sun et al. · 0 citations
#artificial intelligence Preprint Sep 2026

Inference-Time Graph Engineering for Multi-Agent LLM Workflows

This work synthesizes a task-conditioned temporal workflow graph that jointly specifies agent connectivity and edge-level communication semantics, and introduces ReActNet, a training-free framework that compiles a query and a set of role-specialized agents into a sequence of directed communication graphs.

Katherine Tieu, Dong-Qi Fu, Ying-Long Xia et al. · 1 citation · ⚡1
#artificial intelligence Preprint Sep 2026

GraMRAG: Orchestrating Multi-Agent Multi-Step Reasoning via Graph Memory with Reinforcement Learning

GraMRAG is proposed, a graph memory-guided multi-agent RAG framework that integrates a dynamic multimodal memory graph to enable stable, multi-step multimodal reasoning and introduces a vision-text bridged reasoning paradigm that unifies multi-scale entity cropping with a ReAct-style visual toolchain, enhancing the lon...

Zhong-Yu Wang · 0 citations
Open access Aug 2026

GEMA: Graph Embeddings for Multi‐Agent Coordination

Many cooperative multi‐agent tasks are naturally defined by graph‐structured objectives, where agents must collectively reach, for example, a desired relational configuration or satisfy a set of constraints. These objectives often encode spatial arrangements, inter‐agent relations, or constraints that can be formal...

Alessandro Amato, Raffaele Galliera, K. Venable et al. · 0 citations
#artificial intelligence Preprint Sep 2026

GTA: Graph Theory Agent and Benchmark for Algorithmic Graph Reasoning with LLMs

The Graph Theory Agent (GTA), which pairs a preference-trained representation selector with plan-and-decompose scaffolding around a frozen executor LLM, is proposed, which lifts Phi-4 from 53.5% to 69.1% on the benchmark's easy split and from 33.0% to 41.5% on its hard split.

Zi-Xiang Xu, Yan-Bo Wang, Chenxi Wang et al. · 4 citations · ⚡1
#artificial intelligence Preprint Sep 2026

GraphCert: Bootstrap Agentic Graph Reasoning with Certified Evidence Rubrics

Graph agents extend large language models (LLMs) with the ability to actively explore and reason over knowledge graphs through multi-step interactions with graph tools. However, training capable graph agents typically requires large collections of question-answer pairs and reasoning trajectories, whose manual construct...

Wei Jiang, Yu-Chen Ying, Rui Wang et al. · 0 citations

Related blog posts

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.