A multi-agent agentic graph learning framework that partitions the graph into communities and assigns an independent agent to each community for region-specific specialization and shows that MAAGL outperforms SOTA AGL methods.
Abstract
Agentic graph learning (AGL) has recently achieved promising results on graph reasoning tasks, where an agent powered by a large language model (LLM) sequentially samples the graph as evidence to support its final prediction. Existing methods either employ a single agent or orchestrate multiple role-based agents to reason and learn over the entire graph, but both essentially rely on a shared reasoning policy across different graph regions, which can be suboptimal for graphs with heterogeneous structural and semantic patterns. Inspired by the progress of multi-agent collaboration on complex reasoning tasks, a natural remedy is to let multiple agents own different memory and collaborate; however, applying this paradigm to graphs directly faces two challenges. First, existing AGL methods typically verbalize graph structures into natural-language descriptions for LLM agents, making the reasoning process sensitive to the ordering of structural information and thereby breaking the permutation-invariant nature of graphs. Second, incorporating increasingly large sampled neighborhoods leads to rapidly growing contexts. To address these challenges, this paper introduces a multi-agent agentic graph learning (i.e., MAAGL) framework. MAAGL partitions the graph into communities and assigns an independent agent to each community for region-specific specialization. MAAGL represents structural and semantic evidence separately. Structural evidence is summarized by a dynamically updated structural signature that is permutation-invariant and fixed in size, while semantic evidence is filtered to the top-k nodes ranked by relevance. Based on historical trajectories with similar signatures, agents estimate their confidence and trigger debate-style collaboration when needed. Extensive experiments on four benchmark datasets show that MAAGL outperforms SOTA AGL methods.
LLM-based multi-agent systems coordinate specialized reasoning through aggregation, interaction, and adaptive control, yet their potential for graph learning remains unexplored. Graph learning is a natural setting for such systems because useful evidence may arise from heterogeneous local, long-range, global structural...
Jia-Yi Yang, Yi-Fang Chen, Yuan-Fu Sun et al.· 0 citations
This work synthesizes a task-conditioned temporal workflow graph that jointly specifies agent connectivity and edge-level communication semantics, and introduces ReActNet, a training-free framework that compiles a query and a set of role-specialized agents into a sequence of directed communication graphs.
GraMRAG is proposed, a graph memory-guided multi-agent RAG framework that integrates a dynamic multimodal memory graph to enable stable, multi-step multimodal reasoning and introduces a vision-text bridged reasoning paradigm that unifies multi-scale entity cropping with a ReAct-style visual toolchain, enhancing the lon...
Many cooperative multi‐agent tasks are naturally defined by graph‐structured objectives, where agents must collectively reach, for example, a desired relational configuration or satisfy a set of constraints. These objectives often encode spatial arrangements, inter‐agent relations, or constraints that can be formal...
Alessandro Amato, Raffaele Galliera, K. Venable et al.· The AI Magazine· 0 citations
The Graph Theory Agent (GTA), which pairs a preference-trained representation selector with plan-and-decompose scaffolding around a frozen executor LLM, is proposed, which lifts Phi-4 from 53.5% to 69.1% on the benchmark's easy split and from 33.0% to 41.5% on its hard split.
Zi-Xiang Xu, Yan-Bo Wang, Chenxi Wang et al.· 4 citations· ⚡1
Graph agents extend large language models (LLMs) with the ability to actively explore and reason over knowledge graphs through multi-step interactions with graph tools. However, training capable graph agents typically requires large collections of question-answer pairs and reasoning trajectories, whose manual construct...
Wei Jiang, Yu-Chen Ying, Rui Wang et al.· 0 citations