This work synthesizes a task-conditioned temporal workflow graph that jointly specifies agent connectivity and edge-level communication semantics, and introduces ReActNet, a training-free framework that compiles a query and a set of role-specialized agents into a sequence of directed communication graphs.
Abstract
Recent multi-agent LLM systems increasingly rely on graph-structured communication to coordinate specialized agents. We revisit multi-agent orchestration from a graph-engineering perspective: rather than optimizing a static topology, we synthesize a task-conditioned temporal workflow graph that jointly specifies agent connectivity and edge-level communication semantics. We introduce ReActNet, a training-free framework that compiles a query and a set of role-specialized agents into a sequence of directed communication graphs. Each graph snapshot corresponds to one reasoning stage, and each edge carries a natural-language instruction specifying the message that a source agent should provide to a target agent. The compiled temporal graph is then executed through structured message passing: agents update their reasoning states by integrating their previous states with messages from controller-assigned neighbors, and a final aggregator synthesizes the resulting states into the answer. This design separates graph compilation from graph execution, making multi-agent coordination explicit, inspectable, and task-conditioned without requiring reinforcement learning or gradient-based topology optimization. Across knowledge reasoning, mathematical problem solving, code generation, and GAIA-style assistant tasks, ReActNet consistently improves over fixed-topology and learned-topology baselines while maintaining competitive inference cost. These results suggest that effective multi-agent orchestration depends not only on which agents communicate, but also on engineering executable workflow graphs that encode when, why, and how information should flow during reasoning.
LLM-based multi-agent systems coordinate specialized reasoning through aggregation, interaction, and adaptive control, yet their potential for graph learning remains unexplored. Graph learning is a natural setting for such systems because useful evidence may arise from heterogeneous local, long-range, global structural...
Jia-Yi Yang, Yi-Fang Chen, Yuan-Fu Sun et al.· 0 citations
A multi-agent agentic graph learning framework that partitions the graph into communities and assigns an independent agent to each community for region-specific specialization and shows that MAAGL outperforms SOTA AGL methods.
This paper introduces a formal evaluation methodology that is grounded in AgentGraph, a planner powered by a domain specific language that represents agent reasoning through a dynamically adjustable directed graph, and defines novel metrics that measure response and trajectory determinism, structural adherence and sema...
Ram Kulathumani, Regunathan Radhakrishnan, Anupam Tripathi et al.· 0 citations
The Procedural Graph is introduced: just as a knowledge graph organizes factual knowledge into (entity, relation, entity) triplets for what-is questions, a Procedural Graph organizes procedural knowledge into (procedure, relation, procedure) triplets for what-to-do questions.
Yu-Xing Lu, Yi-Cheng Chen, Shan-Chan Wu et al.· 1 citation
This survey presents a systematic taxonomy and technical review of dynamic orchestration strategies designed to address communication overhead, KV cache management challenges, and increased token consumption within large Language Model-based Multi-Agent Systems.
Heet Nagoriya, H. Raithatha· International Journal of Kno...· 0 citations
Graph Engineering is introduced, an emerging paradigm for next-generation agent systems that provides a unified foundation for organizing complex objectives, orchestrating heterogeneous agents, modeling system dynamics, and enabling scalable agent evolution.
Yu-Yuan Feng, Zhi-Shang Xiang, Chao Yang et al.· 5 citations