Skip to content

When to Review: Spaced Repetition for Continual Pre-Training of Language Models

Aug 2026 · 1 citation · 34 references
Computer Science

TL;DR

Spaced Repetition Training (SRT) is introduced, a continual learning framework inspired by cognitive science, which schedules sample-rehearsal using the SuperMemo-2 (SM-2) algorithm, and preserves broad benchmark performance that naive continual pre-training and uniform replay substantially degrade.

Abstract

Continual pre-training of large language models must acquire new information without erasing old knowledge. Existing replay methods often choose a global old/new mixture and sample uniformly, ignoring that examples differ in how quickly they are forgotten. We formulate continual pre-training as adaptive review scheduling: the training loop should decide not only how much history to replay, but which examples should return at each step. We introduce Spaced Repetition Training (SRT), a continual learning framework inspired by cognitive science, which schedules sample-rehearsal using the SuperMemo-2 (SM-2) algorithm. SRT maintains per-example review state, maps per-example perplexity to a recall-quality signal, and schedules historical examples for retention and new examples for consolidation while leaving the model, objective, and optimizer unchanged. On temporally separated Wikipedia and code corpora, SRT improves the stability-plasticity trade-off, recovering 5 to 37 percentage points of old-knowledge accuracy lost by naive continual pre-training across model scales while preserving or improving new-knowledge acquisition. At larger scale, SRT preserves broad benchmark performance that naive continual pre-training and uniform replay substantially degrade. Experiments with vision and tabular data further suggest that the scheduling principle extends beyond language when paired with an appropriate recall signal.

View source

Similar papers

Preprint Jul 2026

When Does Continual Learning Require Learning

The results suggest that continual learning is not a single capability: different patterns of environmental change require fundamentally different update behaviors, determining when adaptation must be learned inside model weights and when it can be achieved through external scaffolding.

A. Harrington, Nayan Saxena, Michael Murphy et al. · 2 citations · ⚡1
#machine learning Preprint Jul 2026

Can a Language Model Learn Facts Continually in Its Weights?

This work follows invented facts written into Qwen3 models from creation through sequences of twenty to one hundred later writes, using held-out questions of five types, and finds that facts can be behaviourally forgotten without being erased.

Charles O'Neill · 0 citations
#machine learning Preprint Aug 2026

Learned, Then Lost: A Measured Single-Example Counterfactual in Pre-training

A single training example's contribution to a finished model is normally estimated rather than measured, because measuring it takes two expensive full pre-training runs that differ in one row of one batch. We ran that counterfactual 24 times at a small scale. We trained 32 GPT-2 models at 124M parameters from scratch o...

Zachary Speck, Asa Shepard · 0 citations
Preprint Aug 2026

Learning What to Remember: Test-Time Training via Context Distillation

This work proposes TTCD, a TTT framework that introduces a self-supervised objective for allocating limited memory capacity for future use, and focuses on an in-place variant: In-Place TTCD, which uses the existing MLP parameters as the fast weights.

Zi-Xuan Wang, Xingyu Dang, Ruiming Zhu et al. · 0 citations
Preprint Aug 2026

What to Forget in Unlearning? Forget Set Curation for Language Models

This work introduces CleanSlate, a benchmark for verbatim output suppression over songs and books, with model-specific extraction profiles, content-grounded QA, and capability-retention evaluations, and shows that practical unlearning is not only an optimization problem once a forget set is given, but also what can be...

Animesh Jha, Arpandeep Khatua, Youssef Allouah et al. · 0 citations
Jul 2026

Rethinking Transfer in Continual Learning: A Replay-Based Realisation

TSR consistently improves forward transfer while maintaining stability, outperforming existing replay baselines across heterogeneous and homogeneous task streams and argues for treating transfer as a first-class objective of continual learning, to be understood before it is engineered.

Yang Meng, Zhenyang Liu, Zhuokai Zhao et al. · 0 citations

Related blog posts

MIT News · Artificial Intelligence Sep 29, 2026

Who we become when we talk to machines

Professor Sherry Turkle’s new book, “Artificial Intimacy,” offers a withering critique of chatbots and the antisocial dynamics she believes they encourage.

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.