Skip to content

Temporal-Causal Inference for Reinforcement Learning via Automata Learning

Sep 2026 · 0 citations · 28 references
Computer Science

TL;DR

Temporal-Causal Inference for Reinforcement Learning (TCIRL), a framework that jointly learns a control policy and infers the hidden temporal cause of the phase transition and recovers the correct cause DFA and matches the full-information baseline in both domains.

Abstract

We consider reinforcement learning in environments with dynamics that undergo an irreversible phase transition governed by a hidden temporal pattern. The agent observes the base state but cannot observe the phase directly. We formalize this problem as a two-phase non-Markovian decision process and introduce Temporal-Causal Inference for Reinforcement Learning (TCIRL), a framework that jointly learns a control policy and infers the hidden temporal cause of the phase transition. TCIRL maintains a hypothesis deterministic finite automaton (DFA) to track what phase is active and refines it via counterexample-driven SAT-based synthesis. We prove that the hypothesis converges almost surely to a DFA recognizing the true cause language on all attainable label sequences, yielding an optimal policy for the original non-Markovian decision process. Experiments on a genetic therapy gridworld and a traffic signal environment show that TCIRL recovers the correct cause DFA and matches the full-information baseline in both domains.

View source

Similar papers

#machine learning Preprint Sep 2026

Efficient Bayes-Adaptive Reinforcement Learning with Temporal Logic Specifications

A novel end-to-end model-based Reinforcement Learning (RL) algorithm for efficient policy synthesis under given Linear Temporal Logic (LTL) specifications in unknown environments is presented and a successful application is showcased for \textit{cautious} RL, namely to reduce the number of task violations incurred duri...

Jonathan Hau, Alessandro Abate · 0 citations
#machine learning Preprint Sep 2026

Looped Actor: Depth-Recurrent Reasoning Models for Reinforcement Learning

Looped reasoning models repeatedly apply a shared set of parameters, enabling more computation without increasing the model size. These models also support input-dependent computation by dynamically deciding when to stop looping. Motivated by the recent success of looped transformers in language modeling and reasoning,...

T. Konstantin Rusch, T. Seyde, J. Boyer et al. · 0 citations
#artificial intelligence Preprint Oct 2026

Hierarchical Reinforcement Learning with Stable Temporal Abstraction for Language Model Agents

Hierarchical reinforcement learning improves long-horizon control by organizing primitive actions around persistent subgoals and assigning credit at multiple temporal scales. Recent hierarchical language agents bring these benefits to interactive tasks by explicitly separating subgoal planning from action execution. We...

Shayan Mohajer Hamidi, Yize Cheng, Yuanda Xu et al. · 1 citation
Open access Aug 2026

Exploration Is a State, Not a Setting: A Markov-Switching Reinforcement-Learning Model of Strategy Transitions in Sequential Choice

It is concluded that exploration is better described as a dynamic state than as a fixed trait, and that modeling it as a switching process is both more accurate and useful.

Fathimah Al-Ma'shumah, Feneta Fidi Kirani, Nita Ratnawaty · 0 citations
Preprint Aug 2026

Learning to Control Coupled-Dynamics Environments with Joint Markov Decision Processes

A nonparametric distributional Bellman optimality operator for JMDPs is defined, and it is proved that when the induced marginal MDP has a unique optimal policy, its iterates converge in Wasserstein distance to the optimal joint return law.

Ege C. Kaya, Aliasghar Pourghani, Mahsa Ghasemi et al. · 0 citations
#artificial intelligence Preprint Sep 2026

Policy Complexity, Reaction Time, and Bounded Rationality in Reinforcement Learning

MI-SARSA is derived, an on-policy temporal-difference algorithm that incorporates mutual-information regularization through a learned marginal action prior and a penalty on state-specific deviations from that prior, which yields a sequential learning model in which state information is used selectively when its expecte...

James T. Wu, C. Sims · 0 citations

Related blog posts

MIT News · Artificial Intelligence Oct 23, 2026

Q&A: How AI came to model the “messy” human mind

Assistant Professor Benjamin Lindquist studies how engineers deliberately injected randomness into early AI, giving rise to deep-learning models that sometimes hallucinate.

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.