Together, these results show that composing complementary mechanisms substantially improves long-horizon memorization beyond what any individual mechanism achieves.
Abstract
Language models may need to internalize information that arrives over time and retain it through many subsequent updates. To study this challenge, we introduce long-horizon memorization, a setting in which a model learns 100 query-answer tasks through continual supervised fine-tuning without retaining earlier training examples or receiving task identifiers at inference. Sequential updates cause catastrophic forgetting, and no single continual learning mechanism we evaluate maintains strong retention at this horizon. We hypothesize that mechanisms addressing complementary sources of forgetting will be more effective when composed. We organize these compositions along two design dimensions. Data, function, and weight anchors specify what prior information each update should preserve, while low-rank allocation rules determine where successive updates are retained. To test this hypothesis systematically, we construct three distinct 100-task memorization datasets. We introduce task-level successive halving to search the combinatorial design space and use a factorial experiment to measure individual and interaction effects. Our best method combines all three anchors with merged LoRA, ranks among the top 3 methods in all datasets, and raises average final retention from 1.2% under naive sequential fine-tuning to 34.9%, a 28-fold improvement. The data anchor and merged LoRA provide the largest average gains and interact super-additively on all three datasets. Together, these results show that composing complementary mechanisms substantially improves long-horizon memorization beyond what any individual mechanism achieves.
Spaced Repetition Training (SRT) is introduced, a continual learning framework inspired by cognitive science, which schedules sample-rehearsal using the SuperMemo-2 (SM-2) algorithm, and preserves broad benchmark performance that naive continual pre-training and uniform replay substantially degrade.
This work introduces Continual Prompt Replay (CPR), which harnesses shared reasoning to improve learning on the arriving and future tasks by replaying previous-task prompts and regenerating their responses with the current policy.
Li-Rui Luo, Guo-Xi Zhang, Hong-Ming Xu et al.· 0 citations
This work evaluates continued pretraining on FineWeb-Edu dumps drawn strictly from after each model's knowledge cutoff, evaluated across six open-weight models spanning three families and four parameter scales, painting a more optimistic picture of time-incremental CPT than the prior continual learning literature sugge...
Firat Öncel, S. Ali, M. Ravanelli et al.· 0 citations
This work derives a token- and layer-wise decomposition of how learning from one token changes another prediction, and connects data attribution, forgetting, and plasticity loss as distinct regimes of the same evolving learning dynamics.
Yi Ren, Wen-Long Deng, Guan-Zhe Hong et al.· 0 citations
This work proposes Golden-GRPO Injection (GRIN), a three-stage self-learning framework for continual knowledge injection that substantially outperforms SFT and mixed-policy RL baselines on the harder question types while matching them on basic fact recall.
Zhibo Hou, Fan Zhao, Zhi-Yu An et al.· 0 citations
GenMem is presented, which reformulates memory management as generative symbolic addressing, a multi-level discrete token tuple drawn from a Cartesian-product address space that factorizes a million-scale sparse memory space using fewer than one hundred discrete symbols.
Xin-Ke Jiang, Tao Feng, Wei-Xuan Xu et al.· 0 citations
Related blog posts
MIT News · Artificial Intelligence· news.mit.eduOct 28, 2026
Professor Paris Smaragdis develops computers with superhuman hearing for applications like speech recognition, music understanding, and environmental monitoring.
MIT News · Artificial Intelligence· news.mit.eduOct 27, 2026
Prabha Jha used her experience with MIT Open Learning’s program for senior executives to develop AI solutions for her employer, Verizon, and to write a book.
Assistant Professor Benjamin Lindquist studies how engineers deliberately injected randomness into early AI, giving rise to deep-learning models that sometimes hallucinate.
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.