Skip to content

Left Turns at Unsignalized Intersections: Decision Making for Autonomous Vehicles Using Deep Reinforcement Learning with Game-Theoretic Reasoning

Aug 2026 · Transportation Research Record · 0 citations · 9 references

TL;DR

Results show that incorporating game-theoretic reasoning substantially improves decision stability, efficiency, and safety compared with a baseline DRL agent, achieving higher rewards, shorter maneuver times, and zero collisions across all scenarios.

Abstract

Left-turn maneuvers at unsignalized intersections pose significant challenges for autonomous vehicles (AVs) as a result of the interactive and uncertain nature of gap-acceptance decisions. This study proposes a deep reinforcement learning-based left-turn with game-theoretic reasoning (DLT-GT) framework that embeds strategic interaction modeling into learning-based decision-making. The framework is formulated as a general integration architecture that can be coupled with different deep reinforcement learning (DRL) agents, with proximal policy optimization serving as a stable implementation backbone in this study. The framework integrates discrete strategic decisions and continuous control through a risk-weighted payoff structure that explicitly captures interactions with surrounding vehicles and pedestrians. Microscopic traffic simulation experiments evaluate performance under varying traffic volumes, aggressiveness levels, and safety sensitivity thresholds. Results show that incorporating game-theoretic reasoning substantially improves decision stability, efficiency, and safety compared with a baseline DRL agent, achieving higher rewards, shorter maneuver times, and zero collisions across all scenarios. These findings demonstrate that augmenting DRL with explicit interaction reasoning provides a generalizable pathway toward safer and more adaptive AV decision-making in complex multiagent environments.

View source

Similar papers

#machine learning Review Open access Oct 2014

Software development in startup companies: A systematic mapping study

The results indicate that software engineering work practices are chosen opportunistically, adapted and configured to provide value under the constrains imposed by the startup context.

Nicolò Paternoster, Carmine Giardino, M. Unterkalmsteiner et al. · 394 citations · ⚡54
#machine learning Review Open access Jun 2014

Why Early-Stage Software Startups Fail: A Behavioral Framework

This state-of-practice investigation was performed using a literature review followed by a multiple-case study approach and presents how inconsistency between managerial strategies and execution can lead to failure by means of a behavioral framework.

Carmine Giardino, Xiaofeng Wang, P. Abrahamsson · 175 citations · ⚡19
#machine learning Review Open access Oct 2016

“Failures” to be celebrated: an analysis of major pivots of software startups

This study conducts a case survey study based on the secondary data of the major pivots happened in 49 software startups, and demonstrates that customer need pivot is the most common among all pivot types.

Sohaib Shahid Bajwa, Xiaofeng Wang, Anh Nguyen-Duc et al. · 127 citations · ⚡15
#machine learning Review Open access May 2016

Key Challenges in Software Startups Across Life Cycle Stages

It is found that what perceived as biggest challenges by software startups do vary across different life cycle stages, even though its significance decreases when the learning focuses of the startups move from problem to solution and their products mature.

Xiaofeng Wang, Henry Edison, Sohaib Shahid Bajwa et al. · 62 citations · ⚡6

Related blog posts

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.