Sep 2026· Robotics: Science and Systems Conference· 0 citations
Abstract
Digital computers have reshaped scientific practice, moving working scientific knowledge from printed texts into algorithms, simulations, and models. Advances in artificial intelligence (AI) are now accelerating that shift, progressing science in areas from protein folding to climate modelling, and raising the prospect of a further transformation in how science is done. With growing hype around the field, there is a risk that inflated claims about AI’s potential obscure both its current limitations and its longer-term possibilities. This paper explores how AI contributes to science, introducing a framework organised around task capabilities, scientific workflow integration, and domain constraints. It uses that framework to open wider questions about the role of AI in scientific discovery. These include: Is scientific knowledge constructed and used by AI agents considered scientific understanding if it is impenetrable to humans, or does scientific understanding refer to an activity that is intrinsically human? What technical advances are needed to move AI beyond pattern matching toward causal reasoning? And what institutional changes are needed to support responsible AI adoption? How researchers and policymakers engage with these questions will shape whether AI accelerates progress within existing scientific paradigms or catalyses the generation of new forms of scientific knowledge. This paper marks the opening of a call for papers from RSS Data Science and AI, which invites contributions that take up these and related questions from multiple perspectives.
The comparison of adopter and non-adopter sample reveals three potential adoption inhibitor, security, data privacy, and portability, which underlines the importance of the technical and security perspectives for research investigating the adoption of technology.
Nattakarn Phaphoom, Xiaofeng Wang, S. Samuel et al.· Journal of Systems and Softw...· 111 citations· ⚡8
This study investigates how Lean internal startup facilitates software product innovation in large companies and identifies its enablers and inhibitors, and shows the potential of the method-in-action framework to investigate the Lean startup approach in non-startup context.
Henry Edison, Nina M. Smørsgård, Xiaofeng Wang et al.· Journal of Systems and Softw...· 78 citations· ⚡6
This paper highlights the challenges to conduct proper affect-related studies with psychology, provides a comprehensive literature review in affect theory, and proposes guidelines for conducting psychoempirical software engineering.
D. Graziotin, Xiaofeng Wang, P. Abrahamsson· SSE@SIGSOFT FSE· 56 citations· ⚡4
This study conducts a multiple case study on twenty European software startups and proposes a prototype-centric learning model in early stage software startups, and identifies factors that occur as barriers but also facilitators for prototyping in earlystage software startups.
Anh Nguyen-Duc, Xiaofeng Wang, P. Abrahamsson· International Conference on...· 44 citations· ⚡5
It is demonstrated that linker-free PROTACs can outperform traditional designs, marking a paradigm shift in PROTAC development for targeted protein degradation.
Pinal, a 16-billion-parameter foundation model that produces protein candidates from natural-language functional descriptions, supports natural language as a high-level interface for candidate generation in protein design, enabling programmable exploration with reduced reliance on manually specified structural or sequence constraints.
A new machine-learning framework aims to improve the success rate of computational protein design while moving away from results that reproduce sequences found in nature.