Aug 2026· Teorie vědy / Theory of Science· 0 citations· 56 references
Computer Science
TL;DR
The advancement of AI in science raises broader questions concerning the division of cognitive labour between human researchers and machines, and a typology of AI systems used in research is proposed, ranging from specialised scientific AI through scientific AI assistants and agents to hybrid experimental systems that combine computation and physical experimentation.
Abstract
This paper examines the growing role of AI in scientific discovery. It first surveys the rapid rise of AI capabilities, especially in reasoning, abstraction, planning, and long-horizon task execution, before turning to scientometric evidence of AI’s diffusion across the sciences. It then proposes a typology of AI systems used in research, ranging from specialised scientific AI through scientific AI assistants and agents to hybrid experimental systems that combine computation and physical experimentation. On this basis, it offers a selective overview of recent achievements in mathematics and computer science, physics, chemistry, the life sciences, and the behavioural and social sciences. It argues that, despite these advances, current systems remain constrained by important technical, epistemic, and institutional limitations, and that their growing use introduces both near-term and longer-term risks. The conclusion further suggests that the advancement of AI in science raises broader questions concerning the division of cognitive labour between human researchers and machines.
A survey of the past and future of AI Scientists: machines capable of automating science, which have the potential to transform science and create a new form of science that will create a new form of science and transform the world.
Bridging Literature, Agents, and Zero-gap Experimentation (BLAZE), a paradigm of socialized scientific intelligence, makes discovery more traceable, reproducible, and cumulative while preserving human creativity, judgment, and responsibility.
Xinjie Yao, Xing-Xin Xu, Xi-Yuan Gao et al.· 0 citations
Seven questions are examined: the erosion of the intergenerational transmission of scientific competence; the growing opacity of AI-generated theories; the collapse of peer evaluation under a flood of machine-generated output; the unproven capacity of AI for paradigm-shifting discovery; the capture of the scientific ag...
This article examines the emerging paradigm of agentic AI for scientific discovery, traces the conceptual shift from tools to agents, lays out a six-stage workflow spanning literature synthesis to manuscript generation, and reviews practical systems in chemistry, equation discovery, materials science, and general machi...
Alexander Taktakidze· Longevity Horizon· 1 citation
This editorial traces key technological milestones across seven decades, from early symbolic reasoning to today's agentic systems capable of autonomously generating hypotheses and accelerating discovery, and examines promising future directions.
Jingyu Lin, P. Hua, Chang-Er Chen et al.· Artificial Intelligence &...· 0 citations
Overall, it is found that the use of coding agents in scientific computing holds great promise for accelerating scientific research and increasing the reliability of critical systems, but that outstanding concerns remain.
Jeremiah H. Li, Alex Rubinsteyn, Sergey Feldman et al.· bioRxiv· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.