Structural investigation of re-docked actives showed that re-ranked poses were more native-like, with improved binding-site occupancy, reduced centroid displacement, and greater recovery of co-crystal interactions.
Abstract
False positives in virtual screening often arise when a single docking score or top-ranked pose is treated as sufficient evidence for binding. We extend the previously introduced ProDock software from a database-backed docking platform into a rank-resolved, multi-engine workflow for automated preparation, docking, pose analysis, and optimized re-ranking. The extended workflow combines local docking with GNINA and global docking with DiffDock with pose-level descriptors, namely binding-site occupancy, ligand localization, interaction-fingerprint similarity, and steric clash counts, together with Optuna -based threshold optimization. Across 43 DUDE-Z targets, the archived benchmark outputs reported higher enrichment values for CNN-based GNINA scores after optimization. CNNaffinity PR-AUC changed from 0.197 to 0.294 and LogAUC from 0.708 to 0.763, whereas empirical affinity ROC-AUC changed from 0.770 to 0.758. Structural investigation of re-docked actives showed that re-ranked poses were more native-like, with improved binding-site occupancy, reduced centroid displacement, and greater recovery of co-crystal interactions. The extension provides a reproducible framework for combining complementary docking engines with interpretable pose-level metrics before hit selection, thereby aiding the identification of true-positive candidates in virtual screening.
Overall, this end-to-end workflow efficiently compresses large libraries into a confirmed micromolar CXCR4 hit while lowering computational and infrastructure barriers for early-stage discovery.
Results indicate that 2D-based docking-score surrogate modeling can provide a reproducible and retrainable strategy for large-scale structure-based virtual screening by concentrating docking resources on a smaller, enriched subset of compounds.
Jongkeun Choi· International Journal of Mol...· 0 citations
Covalent virtual screening requires ranking compounds according to both noncovalent recognition and their ability to adopt a reaction-competent geometry with an appropriately reactive warhead. Here, we introduce BCover, a reaction-aware scoring suite that combines pre-reactive docking with quantum-chemistry-derived lig...
Molecular docking and co-folding engines are widely used to prioritize compounds for wet-lab validation, yet their accuracy is known to vary substantially across protein targets for reasons that remain only qualitatively understood. Here we benchmark six docking and co-folding engines (RevDock, DiffDock, Boltz2, AutoDo...
Kristoffer Alejo, Sarah Fisher, Tejaswan Kalluri et al.· bioRxiv· 0 citations
“NextTopDocker” is presented, a large, up-to-date, open-access data set for docking-power assessment comprising 14,038 training and 5201 test entries across 3173 unique protein targets, constructed from the Protein Data Bank.
Cao-Minh Truong, Pedro J. Ballester, O. Taboureau et al.· Journal of Medicinal Chemist...· 0 citations
A quantitative framework for understanding how docking performance responds to methodological improvements has been lacking is developed by modeling large-scale experiments from three previously published docking campaigns, providing an objective basis for benchmarking and comparing virtual screening approaches.
Laust Moesgaard, Brian K. Shoichet, Olivier Mailhot· Journal of Chemical Informat...· 1 citation
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.