Skip to content
Open access

Rank-Resolved Multi-Engine Docking and Optuna-Optimized Re-Ranking with ProDock for Virtual Screening

Jul 2026 · bioRxiv · 0 citations · 23 references
Biology

TL;DR

Structural investigation of re-docked actives showed that re-ranked poses were more native-like, with improved binding-site occupancy, reduced centroid displacement, and greater recovery of co-crystal interactions.

Abstract

False positives in virtual screening often arise when a single docking score or top-ranked pose is treated as sufficient evidence for binding. We extend the previously introduced ProDock software from a database-backed docking platform into a rank-resolved, multi-engine workflow for automated preparation, docking, pose analysis, and optimized re-ranking. The extended workflow combines local docking with GNINA and global docking with DiffDock with pose-level descriptors, namely binding-site occupancy, ligand localization, interaction-fingerprint similarity, and steric clash counts, together with Optuna -based threshold optimization. Across 43 DUDE-Z targets, the archived benchmark outputs reported higher enrichment values for CNN-based GNINA scores after optimization. CNNaffinity PR-AUC changed from 0.197 to 0.294 and LogAUC from 0.708 to 0.763, whereas empirical affinity ROC-AUC changed from 0.770 to 0.758. Structural investigation of re-docked actives showed that re-ranked poses were more native-like, with improved binding-site occupancy, reduced centroid displacement, and greater recovery of co-crystal interactions. The extension provides a reproducible framework for combining complementary docking engines with interpretable pose-level metrics before hit selection, thereby aiding the identification of true-positive candidates in virtual screening.

Read PDF

Similar papers

Open access Jul 2026

SurroDock: A Deep Learning Surrogate for Accelerated Pre-Docking Ligand Prioritization in Structure-Based Virtual Screening

Results indicate that 2D-based docking-score surrogate modeling can provide a reproducible and retrainable strategy for large-scale structure-based virtual screening by concentrating docking resources on a smaller, enriched subset of compounds.

Jongkeun Choi · 0 citations
Preprint Jul 2026

BCover: An Electronic Structure-Based Scoring Suite for Reaction-Aware Covalent Docking

Covalent virtual screening requires ranking compounds according to both noncovalent recognition and their ability to adopt a reaction-competent geometry with an appropriately reactive warhead. Here, we introduce BCover, a reaction-aware scoring suite that combines pre-reactive docking with quantum-chemistry-derived lig...

Emil Zak, M. Szczepanik · 0 citations
Open access Aug 2026

Structural Context Determines Docking Engine Performance: A Family-Stratified Benchmark of Six Engines

Molecular docking and co-folding engines are widely used to prioritize compounds for wet-lab validation, yet their accuracy is known to vary substantially across protein targets for reasons that remain only qualitatively understood. Here we benchmark six docking and co-folding engines (RevDock, DiffDock, Boltz2, AutoDo...

Kristoffer Alejo, Sarah Fisher, Tejaswan Kalluri et al. · 0 citations
Open access Aug 2026

NextTopDocker: A Large-Scale Docking-Power Benchmark Reveals Limitations of Current End-to-End Machine-Learning Docking and the Strength of Hybrid Rescoring.

“NextTopDocker” is presented, a large, up-to-date, open-access data set for docking-power assessment comprising 14,038 training and 5201 test entries across 3173 unique protein targets, constructed from the Protein Data Bank.

Cao-Minh Truong, Pedro J. Ballester, O. Taboureau et al. · 0 citations
Open access Jul 2026

Modeling the Sensitivity of Large-Scale Virtual Screening to Scoring Function Accuracy, Artifacts, and Library Composition

A quantitative framework for understanding how docking performance responds to methodological improvements has been lacking is developed by modeling large-scale experiments from three previously published docking campaigns, providing an objective basis for benchmarking and comparing virtual screening approaches.

Laust Moesgaard, Brian K. Shoichet, Olivier Mailhot · 1 citation

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.