Jul 2026· International Journal of Molecular Sciences· Vol 27· 0 citations· 40 references
Medicine
TL;DR
Results indicate that 2D-based docking-score surrogate modeling can provide a reproducible and retrainable strategy for large-scale structure-based virtual screening by concentrating docking resources on a smaller, enriched subset of compounds.
Abstract
The rapid expansion of make-on-demand and public chemical libraries has made exhaustive docking-based structure-based virtual screening increasingly difficult. This study introduces SurroDock, a lightweight deep-learning surrogate designed to approximate AutoDock Vina docking scores from low-cost two-dimensional molecular features, serving as a practical pre-filter for docking. SurroDock was evaluated for estrogen receptor alpha using two distinct conformations: an agonist-bound (PDB ID: 1GWR) and an antagonist/SERM-bound (PDB ID: 3ERT). The dataset comprised approximately 334,000 unique compounds curated from the NCI Open Database, PubChem, and BindingDB, all docked using a standardized AutoDock Vina workflow. The model was trained on concatenated 2D molecular representations comprising Morgan fingerprints, MACCS keys, RDKit physicochemical descriptors, Vina-inspired ligand descriptors, atom-pair fingerprints, and 2D pharmacophore fingerprints. The docking-score distributions differed substantially between receptor states, with 3ERT exhibiting more favorable scores than 1GWR and weak inter-state score correlation supporting state-specific modeling. Using the integrated Unified-200k training set (200,000 compounds randomly sampled per receptor from the three docked sources), SurroDock achieved strong held-out validation performance, with R2 values of approximately 0.88 for 1GWR and 0.93 for 3ERT. In retrospective screening-style evaluation, SurroDock recovered substantial fractions of Vina’s top-ranked compounds at the top-1% recall (Recall@1%) of approximately 0.57 and 0.61 for 1GWR and 3ERT, respectively, yielding corresponding enrichment factors (EF@1%) of approximately 57-fold and 61-fold relative to random selection. Overall, the results indicate that 2D-based docking-score surrogate modeling can provide a reproducible and retrainable strategy for large-scale structure-based virtual screening by concentrating docking resources on a smaller, enriched subset of compounds. Because SurroDock emulates a docking scoring function rather than experimental binding affinity, its predictions should be used as prioritization aids and complemented by confirmatory docking, pose inspection, and experimental validation.
A category-stratified, statistically powered benchmark comparing pose prediction from receptor conformational ensembles against AlphaFold2, used as a matched static-structure baseline, across 29 protein–ligand systems spanning cryptic-pocket, induced-fit, water-mediated, and autoimmune-indication target classes is presented.
Ryan Varghese, Pooja Tiwary, Krishil Oswal· bioRxiv· 0 citations
A decision-oriented taxonomy and a benchmark-driven evaluation playbook that specifies minimum standards for splits, metrics, baselines, and ablations to isolate the topological contribution are presented.
Beatriz Suay-García, Antonio Falcó· Briefings in Bioinformatics· 0 citations
False positives in virtual screening often arise when a single docking score or top-ranked pose is treated as sufficient evidence for binding. We extend the previously introduced ProDock software from a database-backed docking platform into a rank-resolved, multi-engine workflow for automated preparation, docking, pose analysis, and optimized re-ranking. The extended workflow combines local docking with GNINA and global docking with DiffDock with pose-level descriptors, namely binding-site occupancy, ligand localization, interaction-fingerprint similarity, and steric clash counts, together with Optuna -based threshold optimization. Across 43 DUDE-Z targets, the archived benchmark outputs reported higher enrichment values for CNN-based GNINA scores after optimization. CNNaffinity PR-AUC changed from 0.197 to 0.294 and LogAUC from 0.708 to 0.763, whereas empirical affinity ROC-AUC changed from 0.770 to 0.758. Structural investigation of re-docked actives showed that re-ranked poses were more native-like, with improved binding-site occupancy, reduced centroid displacement, and greater recovery of co-crystal interactions. The extension provides a reproducible framework for combining complementary docking engines with interpretable pose-level metrics before hit selection, thereby aiding the identification of true-positive candidates in virtual screening.
Lai Hoang Son Le, Thanh-An Pham, Ngoc Nguyen Tran et al.· bioRxiv· 0 citations
Predicting three-dimensional binding orientations of drug-like molecules remains challenging in structure-based drug design. Despite methodological advances, docking performance is often assessed on small and outdated benchmarks. We present “NextTopDocker,” a large, up-to-date, open-access data set for docking-power assessment comprising 14,038 training and 5201 test entries across 3173 unique protein targets, constructed from the Protein Data Bank. Developed with open-source tools, it includes crystallographic structures, Smina-generated docking poses, and ligand-similarity-aware training subsets. We benchmarked four state-of-the-art machine-learning (ML) docking frameworks (DeepDock, Interformer, SurfDock, and Uni-Mol Docking v.2) against classical (Smina) and hybrid baselines (GNINA 1.3 and logistic regression using Smina and GNINA 1.3 scores). Interformer alone matched the docking power of logistic regression on Smina poses, while the others showed dependence on downstream physics-based correction. Most raw ML-generated poses displayed steric clashes and/or implausible geometries, highlighting the need for physics-informed constraints in autonomous docking. “NextTopDocker” is available at https://github.com/caominhtr/NextTopDocker and https://zenodo.org/records/17492994.
Cao-Minh Truong, Pedro J. Ballester, O. Taboureau et al.· Journal of Medicinal Chemist...· 0 citations