Gazefinder-based measures may provide adjunctive information to support screening and referral-related decision-making for clinically defined severe ASD in young children, suggesting that Gazefinder-based measures may provide adjunctive information to support screening and referral-related decision-making for clinically defined severe ASD in young children.
Abstract
Delays in diagnostic confirmation remain common in young children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD). These delays are particularly concerning for children with severe symptoms and elevated support needs, for whom early identification is especially important. There is therefore a need for objective and feasible approaches to assist early identification prior to specialist evaluation. Eye-tracking is a non-invasive method for quantifying gaze-fixation patterns associated with ASD. The present study examined whether gaze-fixation indices derived from the Gazefinder eye-tracking system can identify a clinically defined severe ASD subgroup within a real-world clinical population. The analysis included 442 children aged 2-6 years referred to a child psychiatry outpatient clinic who underwent Gazefinder assessment. Based on Childhood Autism Rating Scale (CARS) scores, children were classified into a Severe ASD group (n = 42) and an Other group (Non-ASD and Mild-to-moderate ASD; n = 400). Gaze fixation rates on predefined regions of interest were compared, and discriminative performance was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic analyses. Children in the Severe ASD group exhibited reduced fixation on the mouth region in dynamic facial stimuli and reduced fixation on people relative to geometry. A composite criterion derived from four gaze-fixation indices yielded a sensitivity of 85.7% and a specificity of 55.3% for discriminating Severe ASD. These findings suggest that Gazefinder-based measures may provide adjunctive information to support screening and referral-related decision-making for clinically defined severe ASD in young children.
It is argued that future early ASD detection systems should be developed as clinician-supervised decision-support tools rather than autonomous diagnostic instruments.
Wenhao Luo, Z. Yin, Jianbiao Dai· Diagnostics· 0 citations
Behavioral observation through examiner-child structured interactive play, particularly metrics related to eye contact, effectively differentiates toddlers with iASD.
Dan Ai, Binyue Hu, Qiuhong Wei et al.· BMC Psychiatry· 0 citations
Children born EPT have increased positive ASDS and it is important to assess their socioemotional development early and pos-ASDS risk factors to facilitate prompt intervention.
Myriam Peralta-Carcelen, S. Hintz, Carla M. Bann et al.· Journal of Perinatology· 0 citations
Artificial intelligence shows promise as a supportive tool for early screening, but current evidence supports its use as a complement to, rather than replacement for, clinical assessment.
Andrea Catalina Mahecha Ballesteros, Juanita Valeria García Bello, Eleaine Scarlet González Zuñiga et al.· Current Psychiatry Reports· 0 citations
It is suggested that eye-tracking-based ML models may provide a promising approach for early screening of developmental conditions and ASD-GDD differentiation and future studies should validate these findings in larger, multicenter, and more balanced samples with richer dynamic eye-tracking representations.
Gang Zhou, Xiao-Bin Zhang, Xingda Qu et al.· Research in Developmental Di...· 1 citation
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.