Skip to content
Review Open access

Integrating delivery systems and microenvironmental cues to accelerate clinical translation of cardiac reprogramming

Aug 2026 · Materials Today Bio · Vol 40 · 0 citations · 205 references
Medicine

TL;DR

Innovations in pericardial delivery systems and optimized manufacturing protocols now pave the way for future clinical translation of direct cardiac reprogramming strategies, which could redefine heart failure therapy.

Abstract

Direct cardiac reprogramming, which converts cardiac fibroblasts into functional cardiomyocytes, has emerged as a promising regenerative strategy for heart failure. Preclinical studies have demonstrated its potential to mitigate adverse remodeling; however, critical challenges remain in delivery precision, reprogramming efficiency, and scalability for clinical translation. Here, we review innovations in delivery systems and microenvironmental engineering aimed at overcoming these barriers. Integration-free viral vectors (e.g. Sendai virus and adeno-associated virus 5) and non-viral platforms (e.g. nanoparticles and modified ribonucleic acid) have shown improved targeting of cardiac fibroblasts and enabled transient reprogramming. In parallel, microenvironmental modulation—such as immune regulation, biomechanical tuning of substrate stiffness, and the use of 3D-bioprinted matrices—has enhanced the survival and functionality of reprogrammed cells. Recent studies emphasize the need to balance genomic safety with delivery efficiency. While viral systems can achieve sustained factor expression, non-viral approaches minimize integration-associated risks. Large-animal models have further demonstrated the role of immune modulation and tissue-specific hydrogels in improving therapeutic retention. Advances in pericardial delivery systems and optimized manufacturing protocols now pave the way for future clinical translation. Nonetheless, unresolved issues—such as the long-term genomic stability of reprogrammed human cells and immune compatibility—still warrant rigorous investigation. By integrating targeted delivery, microenvironmental engineering, and scalable production, direct reprogramming strategies could redefine heart failure therapy. Collaborative efforts to address residual scientific and technical hurdles will determine their potential to benefit the 64 million patients affected globally.

Read PDF

Similar papers

Review Open access Jul 2026

AAV Vectors in Regenerative Medicine and Cellular Reprogramming: Potential, Pitfalls, and Specificity Constraints

Evidence that cell-type-specific promoters lose fidelity when paired with neurogenic transgene payloads and that published in vivo reprogramming efficiencies may be substantially confounded by promoter leakage in the absence of formal lineage tracing are synthesized.

M. Abdelnaby, A. Galiakberova, E. Dashinimaev · 0 citations
#gene editing Review Open access Aug 2026

Induced pluripotent stem cell reprogramming: methodological evolution and challenges in clinical translation

This review summarizes the trajectory of iPSC reprogramming technologies and identifies the core “translational triltrilas”, namely, the inherent tradeoffs between security, homogeneity, and scalability, and proposes a comprehensive strategy to overcome these bottlenecks.

Meng-Meng Chen, N. Zuo, Qi Wang et al. · 0 citations
Review Jul 2026

Engineering the blood: Lipid nanoparticle platforms for ex vivo immune and hematopoietic cell therapies.

This review aims to provide actionable guidance to bench-side cell engineering to broad clinical applications by comprehensively discussing recent advancements in LNP formulation and next-generation RNA payload engineering.

Yongjoo Byeon, Nuoya Peng, Eun Bee Oh et al. · 0 citations
Review Jul 2026

Translational cell fate reprogramming and regenerative medicine enabled by microphysiological systems.

This review discusses how organoids and OoC-based platforms are being leveraged to study and enhance cell fate reprogramming, repair, and regeneration across multiple tissues and outlines current limitations, including scalability, standardization, and biomaterial constraints.

Hrithiha Sriramulu, Hyunsung Woo, Anavi Kaul et al. · 1 citation
#gene editing Review Open access Aug 2026

Genetically Modified MSCs for Targeted Regeneration: Balancing Efficacy, Biosafety, and GMP Standardization

Development of safe-harbor integration and B2M/CIITA-based hypoimmunogenic designs as strategies to reduce engineering-related batch variability and HLA-dependent donor variability support a transition from empirical optimized MSC preparations toward molecularly defined cellular medicines with predefined genotype, expr...

Kristina V. Kitaeva, I. Filin, A. Rizvanov et al. · 0 citations
#gene editing Review Open access Aug 2026

Biomaterial-Assisted Stem Cell Therapy and Exosome Delivery in Myocardial Infarction: A Narrative Review

Current evidence demonstrates that injectable hydrogels, extracellular matrix-derived scaffolds, cardiac patches, conductive biomaterials, and multifunctional delivery platforms improve therapeutic retention, prolong paracrine signaling, and actively modulate inflammation, angiogenesis, fibrosis, and extracellular matr...

Amanda-Ioana Răduţă, A. Treteanu, O. Andronic et al. · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.