Skip to content
Book Open access

Transforming Computing Education in Africa: A Scoping Review of the Potential of Generative AI to Enhance Higher-Order Thinking Skills in Programming Education

Aug 2026 · International Computing Education Research Workshop · pp. 132-144 · 0 citations · 27 references
Computer Science

TL;DR

It is suggested that GenAI has significant potential to enhance HOTS in African programming education, but sustainable and equitable integration requires AI-resilient assessment, faculty professional development, institutional policy guidance, locally relevant tools, and further longitudinal, experimental, classroom-based, and faculty-centred research.

Abstract

This scoping review examines how Generative AI (GenAI) can support higher-order thinking skills (HOTS) in programming education across African higher education institutions. Guided by Arksey and O’Malley’s scoping review framework and PRISMA-ScR principles, the review synthesised 11 studies published between 2020 and 2025. The findings show that GenAI tools, including ChatGPT, GitHub Copilot, Microsoft Copilot, Google Gemini, Codey, Kwame, AutoGrad, SuaCode, and Brilla AI, can support problem-solving, critical thinking, creativity, abstraction, programming logic, computational thinking, and metacognitive reflection. These benefits were most evident when GenAI was embedded in structured pedagogical designs such as project-based learning, problem-based learning, guided discovery, constructivist learning, prompt engineering, reflective learning, collaborative learning, and assessment-redesign approaches. In evidence from the synthesised studies, GenAI functioned most effectively as a learning scaffold when students were required to question, test, debug, compare, justify and reflect on AI-generated outputs. Conversely, weakly structured use risked surface-level engagement, over-reliance, plagiarism, and limited conceptual understanding. The review also identified contextual barriers to adoption, including unreliable internet access, device constraints, subscription costs, uneven faculty readiness, limited institutional policies, academic integrity concerns, and assessment validity challenges. Culturally and linguistically responsive GenAI integration emerged as a critical need, particularly in multilingual African learning environments where Western-centric datasets, examples, and pedagogical assumptions may not fully reflect local realities. This review suggests that GenAI has significant potential to enhance HOTS in African programming education, but sustainable and equitable integration requires AI-resilient assessment, faculty professional development, institutional policy guidance, locally relevant tools, and further longitudinal, experimental, classroom-based, and faculty-centred research.

Read PDF

Similar papers

Review Open access Oct 2026

STEAM and Computational Thinking in Technology-Enhanced Education: A Systematic Review of Learning Design

This systematic literature review examines how STEAM (science, technology, engineering, arts, and mathematics) and computational thinking (CT) activities are conceptualized and implemented in technology-enhanced learning environments in primary and lower secondary education. Guided by PRISMA 2020 procedures, 34 empiric...

Ausra Kazlauskiene, Valentina Dagienė · 0 citations
Review Open access Oct 2026

Mapping generative AI in higher education teaching and learning: a scoping review

Generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) has rapidly entered higher education, but empirical research on its roles in teaching and learning remains fragmented across instructional activities, outcomes, assessment approaches, and stakeholder perspectives. This scoping review followed PRISMA-ScR guidelines to map 394 e...

M. P. Lin, Daniel H. Chang, Philip H. Winne et al. · 0 citations
#human-computer interacti... Preprint Sep 2026

Critical Thinking with Generative AI: A Constraint-First Design Pilot of a Thinking-Partner Intervention

Findings indicate that one semester of GenAI-assisted instruction can move domain learning and self-reported AI literacy but does not move standardized critical thinking, and that the modal student-LLM relationship is one of validation instead of dialogue.

F. Zahra, Jiangen He, David M. Bowers et al. · 0 citations
Review Open access Sep 2026

The role of design thinking in enhancing students’ creative thinking: a narrative review

Creative thinking is widely prioritized in education, but schools and universities still struggle to cultivate and assess it consistently. Design thinking (DT) has been adopted as a human-centered, iterative approach that may support creative development through empathy, problem framing, ideation, prototyping, and...

Amina Abibullakyzy, Danebek Poshayev, Ainakul Uzakhova et al. · 0 citations
#generative ai Open access Sep 2026

An AI-Enhanced Analytic Rubric for Assessing Higher-Order Thinking Skills in Pakistani Higher Education: A Framework Development and Validation Design

The conceptual architecture and validation design of an Artificial Intelligence-Enhanced Analytic Rubric for assessing HOTS in Pakistani higher education is developed and the framework is designed to support assessment that is criterion-referenced, transparent, ethically bounded, and sensitive to the Pakistani higher-e...

Ajaz Shaheen, Muhabat Khan, Fátima · 0 citations
Review Sep 2026

A Study on the Development of an Education Model for Enhancing AID Competency through Case Analysis of Generative AI-Integrated Courses

This study developed an AID (AI+Digital) Competency Enhancement Education Model by analyzing six generative AI-integrated courses at S University in 2025. Using Yin's multiple case study design, six courses across five disciplinary tracks were analyzed along four axes: teaching-learning, assessment, AI utilization, and...

Jiong-Jun Hong · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.