Large Language Models (LLMs) are being increasingly used in everyday applications. A major challenge in the context of LLMs or Artificial Intelligence (AI) in general is to ensure privacy when using them, meaning that personally identifiable information (PII) is removed from any text that enters an LLM. These challenges have become more urgent with novel EU legislation. Uncertainty around LLM usage with respect to privacy concerns in EU countries can be a major blocker for the speed of innovation and transfer from research to applications. Here we present \textbf{Redakto}, a tool that can be used for anonymizing text prior to feeding it to an LLM or other downstream text processing. We provide state-of-the-art functionalities for both redaction of PII but also when used for pseudonymization. These functionalities are exposed such that they can easily be used by end-users, through the Redakto web application, and by developers and researchers, via REST APIs and model context protocol (MCP) hooks. The implementation is fully open source, requires modest compute resources, and can be readily deployed on local hardware. In contrast to prior work and in order to better assess the quality of the anonymized texts, we conduct extensive empirical evaluations on textual data from legal and medical domain with respect to both privacy and utility of the redacted texts. Our empirical results demonstrate that the texts anonymized with different redaction strategies achieve utility scores on par with the original texts, suggesting that anonymization with Redakto can be used for LLM tasks without substantial negative impact for the tasks we explored.
An evaluation paradigm that assesses model responses along three criteria grounded in cooperative response theory is designed, suggesting pragmatic redirection is a fundamentally underdeveloped capability in current LLMs.
Akhila Yerukola, Jena D. Hwang, Ming-Qian Zheng et al.· 1 citation
The role of traditional models in current NLP research and practice is discussed, especially in contrast and comparison to modern neural network-based approaches including LLMs.
Robin Jegan· Schriften aus der Fakultät W...· 0 citations
Large Language Models (LLMs) such as ChatGPT, Gemini, Claude, etc. have become integral tools for technical writing, software development, and communication. However, these systems, despite privacy assurances, still expose a significant privacy risk. User prompts often contain personally identifiable or proprietary inf...
Aditya Vishwakarma, Wencen Wu· International Conference on...· 0 citations
The recent meteoric rise of LLMs (Large Language Models) and associated tools was largely unexpected and surprising to most. The rapid ascent of this technology has caught many software developers unawares, leaving them suddenly somewhat ignorant, and arguably under-skilled.
LLMs, whilst still advancing, have recently...
Adam Retter· Balisage Series on Markup Te...· 0 citations
BLIP is presented, a bolt-on framework for efficiently inferring a small-sized verifiable provenance for any LLM-powered data processing task, with any LLM, and eight strategies, each guaranteed to find a minimal verifiable provenance are introduced.
Yi-Ming Lin, Sepanta Zeighami, Aditya G. Parameswaran· Proceedings of the VLDB Endo...· 0 citations
This study provides an initial assessment on the feasibility of using LLMs as a KB for CH, using “Galois”, a recent framework for executing Structured Query Language (SQL) queries over LLMs with logical and physical optimizations tailored to the model’s behavior.
Mirco Cazzaro, G. Silvello· 1 citation
Related blog posts
MIT News · Artificial Intelligence· news.mit.eduOct 13, 2026
Machine-learning networks can learn without detailed instructions from a designer. Those that do may offer insight into how the brain reorganizes itself during learning.
MIT News · Artificial Intelligence· news.mit.eduSep 29, 2026
Professor Sherry Turkle’s new book, “Artificial Intimacy,” offers a withering critique of chatbots and the antisocial dynamics she believes they encourage.