Skip to content
Preprint

Branch-JEPA: Finite-Support Predictive Distributions for JEPA World Models

Jul 2026 · 0 citations · 40 references
Computer Science

TL;DR

Branch-JEPA is introduced, which replaces this point-valued transition with a context-weighted finite set of latent successors, and preserves more distinct futures, while full-set scoring improves the quality of the resulting predictive distribution.

Abstract

Joint-embedding predictive architectures (JEPAs) learn dynamics by predicting future observations in representation space. Yet most JEPA world models return one latent successor, even when hidden intent, partial observation, or stochastic dynamics make several futures plausible. We introduce Branch-JEPA, which replaces this point-valued transition with a context-weighted finite set of latent successors. Every branch is decoded independently, and the complete set is retained at inference. The architecture supports two complementary training regimes: specialization for recovering separated successors and full-set Energy-Score training for distributional fidelity. In a locked five-seed evaluation on the Argoverse~2 official validation split, full-set training improves trajectory Energy Score by $5.8$--$6.5\%$ and probability-weighted trajectory distance by $9.3$--$10.4\%$ over matched-$K{=}6$ assignment and transport objectives, while retaining $5.36$ endpoint-deduplicated effective branches. In a parameter-exact official-validation comparison, latent branching retains $10.3\%$ more effective modes and improves Energy Score, expected ADE, and Brier in all five paired seeds over branching only at the output decoder; every paired 95\% interval excludes zero. In an OGBench graph audit, Branch-JEPA increases teleport verified-route existence to $19.2\%$ versus $3.9\%$ for the MDN. Its raw-support advantage also persists with 29-D state and RGB observations. Together, latent branching preserves more distinct futures, while full-set scoring improves the quality of the resulting predictive distribution.

View source

Similar papers

#machine learning Preprint Aug 2026

JEPA-x: Cross-Predictive Physics Grounding for Forecastable Latent Dynamics

This work introduces the cross-predictive JEPA (JEPA-x), which grounds latent dynamics in privileged physical trajectories, and shows that direct physical-state regression improves decodability without improving forecastability or control, indicating that the benefit comes from shaping latent dynamics rather than merel...

Kehan Wen, Ziming Li, Si-Yuan Luo et al. · 2 citations
#machine learning Preprint Jul 2026

Qantara: Bridge-Flow Training for Multi-Paradigm JEPA Control

Qantara is presented, an end-to-end JEPA whose joint training objective pairs a Brownian-bridge interpolant between consecutive clean latents on the state axis with noise-to-data flow matching on the action axis, and these results move JEPA world models from single-paradigm planners to multi-paradigm controllers.

Ruslan Rakhimov, George Bredis, Yuriy Maksyuta et al. · 2 citations
Preprint Aug 2026

Rollout-Decoded Reconstruction for Long-Horizon Prediction in Latent World Models

Rollout-Decoded Reconstruction (RDR) closes this gap with a single loss term that free-runs the model during training exactly as evaluation will, decodes every rollout latent, and penalizes reconstruction error against ground truth.

Rishita Shah, Rishav Shrestha · 0 citations
#machine learning Preprint Aug 2026

Orthogonal JEPA: Factorized Predictive States for Latent World Models

Method, a latent world-modeling framework based on orthogonal predictive factorization, is introduced, a latent world-modeling framework based on orthogonal predictive factorization that can be used by a readout, decoder, planner, or autoregressive rollout of an underlying system.

Tao-Yong Cui, Pheng-Ann Heng, Wan-Li Ouyang · 0 citations
#artificial intelligence Preprint Aug 2026

No Gaussian Required: Contrastive Inverse Dynamics for JEPA World Models

Contrastive inverse dynamics thus provides a distribution-free anti-collapse signal that requires no target network, stop-gradient, pretrained encoder, or reconstruction objective, and it is argued that the anti-collapse pressure can instead come from the transition data itself.

Jack Boylan, Chris Hokamp · 6 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.