Skip to content
#gene editing Review Open access

Stem cell–based therapies in pediatric disorders: translational advances, unresolved challenges, and future horizons

Aug 2026 · Stem cell research & therapeutics · Vol 17 · 0 citations · 132 references
Medicine

TL;DR

This paper will provide the current information on stem cells used in the treatment of children and the many different types of stem cells, including: hematopoietic stem cells (and their derivatives), mesenchymal stem cells (and their derivatives), induced pluripotent stem cells, embryonic stem cells, tissue-specific progenitor cells, extracellular vesicles, and bioengineered products.

Abstract

Pediatric disorders consist of genetic, hematologic, neurologic, autoimmune, and inflammatory diseases. These conditions impose long-term health challenges on children, despite many advancements with conventional medicine. Although conventional treatments increase life expectancy and provide better disease control, many present challenges such as toxicity, insufficient control of the disease, and adverse effects on normal growth, development, and quality of life. Many researchers have shown increased interest in using stem cell therapies as an alternative to current medications to allow for complete, sustainable repair of damaged tissues and modification of disease processes (i.e., using stem cells to regenerate tissue or change the way in which a disease occurs). This paper will provide the current information on stem cells used in the treatment of children and the many different types of stem cells, including: hematopoietic stem cells (and their derivatives), mesenchymal stem cells (and their derivatives), induced pluripotent stem cells, embryonic stem cells, tissue-specific progenitor cells, extracellular vesicles, and bioengineered products. This paper will also discuss what is known about the stem cells listed as well as their methods of action, where they might currently be better utilized, and future uses of these cells in children for a variety of types of pediatric diseases. Because each stem cell type listed has very different scientific background and clinical evidence, there is much variability in the amount of scientific evidence available to support stem cell therapies. For example, hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) has over 50 years of clinical experience; thus, there are many studies defining the clinical efficacy and long-term outcomes associated with HSCT. Conversely, while there are many published studies supporting the use of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs), extracellular vesicles (EVs), gene-edited cells, organoids, and many induced pluripotent stem cell-derived therapies, more evidence (clinical and basic science) is still needed to fully establish efficacy for the use of these various stem cells in children with pediatric diseases. In addition to needing more clinical evidence, stem cell-based therapies face many important challenges to the advancement of these therapies, including (but not limited to) long-term safety assessments, manufacturing standardization, regulatory oversight, ethical concerns, and equitable access to advanced therapies. Addressing these challenges will be important for future advances in the use of regenerative medicine in pediatric patients which will also require the rigorous evaluation of new stem cell therapies, the continued improvement of translational mechanisms, and the ongoing incorporation of new techniques (e.g., genome editing, organoid modeling, EV therapeutics, bioengineering, and artificial intelligence) to advance regenerative medicine and demonstrate its value through safe and reproducible clinical trial results.

Read PDF

Similar papers

#gene editing Review Sep 2026

Unlocking non-model organisms with CRISPR-Cas: A roadmap for sustainable biotechnology.

It is concluded that bridging the gap between foundational CRISPR research and its real-world applications is imperative and future efforts should focus on democratizing tools via open-source platforms, advancing delivery systems, and fostering sustainable innovation through synthetic biology integration to fully realize the transformative potential of genome editing in organisms beyond model organisms.

S. Sarsaiya, Archana Jain, Jishuang Chen et al. · 2 citations
#gene editing Review Open access Aug 2026

Environmental Risk Assessment and Confinement of Genetically Engineered Trees with an Emphasis on Vegetative Reproduction.

Genetic engineering (GE) and gene editing may endow traits to trees such as increased biomass and the production of novel biomaterials. Long-lived organisms such as trees might be subject to biotechnology-related risks that could be different than those of annual row crops. Those risks could be relevant to production in engineered plantations and beyond plantations to natural forests. Therefore, appropriate risk regulation is important to assure biosafety of commercialized engineered trees. In addition to gene flow via sexual reproduction, vegetative reproduction might play an additional role in environmental "exposure" risk relative to transgene dispersal in GE tree plantations. While vegetative reproduction is beneficial for preserving desired genetic traits during tree propagation, it may lead to proximal clonal spread in the field. Although the environmental risks associated with vegetative reproduction of GE trees are recognized in commercial forestry, there are few field-based environmental risk assessment (ERA) studies on dispersal risks of self-propagated GE trees. GE or gene editing of target genes involved in the vegetative propagation processes may be useful to mitigate environmental risks of clonal spread through vegetative reproduction. This review provides updates for recent field test results of GE and gene edited trees. Gene candidates related to vegetative reproduction including adventitious shooting (AS) and adventitious rooting (AR) are discussed herein as a means to mitigate unintended clonal spread from GE tree plantations.

Yongil Yang, C. N. Stewart · 0 citations
#gene editing Open access Aug 2026

Programmable RNA targeting with clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR) effector Cas7-11 in zebrafish embryos and mammalian cells

Findings establish Cas7-11 as a precise and efficient RNA knockdown tool for functional studies in embryonic development and stem cell biology, providing a versatile alternative to DNA-based gene-editing approaches.

Huan Yan, Imtiaz Ul Hassan, Kai Yan et al. · 0 citations

Related blog posts

MIT News · Artificial Intelligence Aug 17, 2026

Q&A: Rethinking how innovation happens

In his latest book, Professor Eugene Fitzgerald examines the forces that turn breakthroughs into value — and why innovation resists simple formulas.