Machine Learning in Materials ScienceArtificial Intelligence Applications
Abstract
The inference of physical laws has traditionally relied on human intuition, analytical reasoning, and experimental observation. However, modern physics research is increasingly constrained by challenges such as high specialization, fragmented workflows, and limited computational resources, which impede scientific progress. To address these issues, we introduce
PhysAgent
, a novel multi-agent system powered by large language models (LLMs), designed to execute end-to-end scientific workflows—from hypothesis generation and computational modeling to data analysis and reporting. PhysAgent’s innovation lies in its specialized agent collaboration: a Mentor Agent guides scientific reasoning through Socratic questioning, a Student Agent handles technical execution (e.g., code implementation, DFT calculations), and a Leader Agent dynamically optimizes task scheduling and resource allocation. Integrating domain-specific tools like first-principles simulations (e.g., Quantum ESPRESSO, VASP), PhysAgent aims to improve reproducibility while maintaining human-in-the-loop refinement. We demonstrate PhysAgent as a proof-of-concept framework for recovering known physical relations from controlled data, including Kepler-law recovery from orbital trajectories and Newton-law recovery from force-motion data. Furthermore, it extends to ab initio materials modeling, automating electronic structure workflows (e.g., GaAs band-structure and density-of-states calculations). In addition, PhysAgent simulates complex real-world phenomena, such as raindrop flow on train windows. By harmonizing LLM-driven planning with domain-specific tools, PhysAgent provides a reproducible multi-agent workflow for physics data analysis and simulation. We provide a demonstration video of PhysAgent to illustrate its workflow and capabilities: https://b23.tv/emOilkC.
The results are packaged in the Greenfield Startup Model (GSM), which explains the priority of startups to release the product as quickly as possible, and the need to shorten time-to-market, by speeding up the development through low-precision engineering activities.
Carmine Giardino, Nicolò Paternoster, M. Unterkalmsteiner et al.· IEEE Transactions on Softwar...· 178 citations· ⚡14
Software startup companies develop innovative, software-intensive products within limited timeframes and with few resources, searching for sustainable and scalable business models.
M. Unterkalmsteiner, P. Abrahamsson, Xiaofeng Wang et al.· e-Informatica Software Engin...· 157 citations· ⚡17
This study conducts a case survey study based on the secondary data of the major pivots happened in 49 software startups, and demonstrates that customer need pivot is the most common among all pivot types.
Sohaib Shahid Bajwa, Xiaofeng Wang, Anh Nguyen-Duc et al.· Empirical Software Engineeri...· 127 citations· ⚡15
The comparison of adopter and non-adopter sample reveals three potential adoption inhibitor, security, data privacy, and portability, which underlines the importance of the technical and security perspectives for research investigating the adoption of technology.
Nattakarn Phaphoom, Xiaofeng Wang, S. Samuel et al.· Journal of Systems and Softw...· 111 citations· ⚡8
The ongoing work building a Raspberry Pi cluster consisting of 300 nodes is presented, with potential use cases being an inexpensive and green test bed for cloud computing research and a robust and mobile data center for operating in adverse environments.
P. Abrahamsson, S. Helmer, Nattakarn Phaphoom et al.· IEEE International Conferenc...· 110 citations· ⚡7
The findings show that speed related agile practices are used to a greater extent in comparison to quality practices, and that software startups who adopt the Lean Startup approach do not sacrifice quality for speed more than other startups do.
Jevgenija Pantiuchina, Marco Mondini, Dron Khanna et al.· International Conference on...· 84 citations· ⚡4