Jul 2026· ELS Journal on Interdisciplinary Studies in Humanities· Vol 9, pp. 654-662· 0 citations· 41 references
TL;DR
The study proposes a conceptual framework describing AI-assisted text-to-animation learning as a cyclical engagement process and suggests that the educational value of generative AI depends on instructional design that promotes critical interaction with generated output.
Abstract
The increasing availability of generative artificial intelligence (AI) tools has introduced new possibilities for transforming how students interact with academic texts. While most educational discussions have focused on AI-assisted writing and assessment, the role of AI in supporting reading engagement remains underexplored. This study presents a narrative literature review examining the relationship between generative AI, multimodal learning, and reading engagement in higher education. Relevant studies were identified through academic databases using keywords related to generative AI in education, multimodal learning, and reading engagement, and were analyzed through thematic categorization. The review indicates that AI-mediated text transformation, particularly converting text into visual or animated representation, may restructure reading activity into an iterative process involving rereading, verification, and adjustment. Such interaction aligns with cognitive, behavioral, and affective dimensions of engagement by encouraging learners to compare generated representations with original textual sources. Rather than functioning as an automated comprehension tool, generative AI can act as a mediating learning artefact that supports active involvement with reading material when pedagogically guided. The study proposes a conceptual framework describing AI-assisted text-to-animation learning as a cyclical engagement process. The findings suggest that the educational value of generative AI depends on instructional design that promotes critical interaction with generated output. Future research should empirically investigate classroom implementation to validate the proposed framework.
Background and Objectives: Critical literacy, a key four C's (4C) competencies, is essential for navigating digital complexities. In today’s context, critical literacy goes beyond understanding texts, involving the ability to interpret meanings across modes, uncover underlying ideologies, and critically evaluate the in...
I. Dwipayana, I. Sutama, I. W. Rasna et al.· Suranaree Journal of Social...· 0 citations
Background: Multimodal generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) can process written language, images, typography, layout, and interface-like elements, creating opportunities for literature education but also new epistemic risks. Vision-capable models may combine accurate recognition, plausible inference, and invented...
Milan Mašát· Review of Artificial Intelli...· 0 citations
As artificial intelligence (AI) increasingly reshapes language learning through multimodal environments involving text, audio, and images, recent research has called for more dynamic and system-oriented approaches to understanding learner engagement. Against this background, the present study examined the relationships...
Yongliang Wang· International Journal of TES...· 1 citation
This study explores an innovative teaching experience implemented in a public primary school in Tenerife (Spain). The intervention focused on creative writing in English supported by generative artificial intelligence (AI), within the school library as an expanded learning environment. Through the collaborative creatio...
Zeus Plasencia-Carballo, Cristian García-Santana, Raquel Ester Bethencourt-Pérez et al.· Lenguaje y Textos· 0 citations
This study aims to explore how B2-level students enrolled in a university preparatory program use data-driven learning and generative AI tools in the collaborative opinion essay writing process and highlights the critical role of pedagogical design and teacher facilitation in DDL-AI-assisted writing instruction.
B. Uzuner· Digital Studies in Language...· 0 citations
It is argued that the central educational challenge is not whether GenAI improves single-task language performance, but how learners develop calibrated trust, critical judgment, self-regulated feedback use, and professional agency in human–AI language-learning environments.
Xiong Wang· Frontiers in Education· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.