Skip to content
Review Open access

Reading With, Not Through, AI: A Human-Centered Framework for Multimodal Literature Education

Aug 2026 · Review of Artificial Intelligence in Education · 0 citations · 14 references

Abstract

Background: Multimodal generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) can process written language, images, typography, layout, and interface-like elements, creating opportunities for literature education but also new epistemic risks. Vision-capable models may combine accurate recognition, plausible inference, and invented visual detail in a single fluent interpretation. The central challenge is not access to multimodal information, but disciplined separation of observation, inference, interpretation, and human judgment. Objective: This perspective paper develops Multimodal Evidence-Bounded Interpretation (MEBI), a human-centered framework designed to preserve close reading, interpretive plurality, evidential accountability, and student authorship when multimodal GenAI is used with literary texts. Methods: The study uses an evidence-informed conceptual synthesis and a worked multimodal case. Recent peer-reviewed research on GenAI-supported learning, student agency, literary analysis, multimodal AI, and visual hallucination is integrated with established scholarship on multimodality and graphic narrative and with human-centered AI guidance. The framework is demonstrated through selected scan locations from Nora Dåsnes’s Czech graphic narrative Na kočičí svědomí (2024). Results: MEBI comprises five design propositions—human-first encounter, modal traceability, observation–inference separation, preserved interpretive plurality, and human adjudication and authorship—and a five-phase sequence: Encounter, Describe, Hypothesize, Audit, and Adjudicate & Author. Five evidence tags track verbal, image, sequential-spatial, typographic-graphic, and digital-interface evidence. A worked case, classroom sequence, evidence ledger, and assessment heuristic operationalize the framework. Conclusion: MEBI positions AI as a generator of descriptions, hypotheses, counter-readings, and questions rather than as interpretive authority. It offers a researchable design for multimodal literature education while requiring empirical validation across genres, languages, age groups, and educational contexts.

Read PDF

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.