Pretrained machine-learning interatomic potentials, so-called universal or foundation models offer an appealing starting point for atomistic simulations, but their accuracy for material-specific observables often remains limited without additional reference data (fine-tuning). Here, we systematically quantify how much first-principles data are required to convert universal models into ab initio-accurate material-specific potentials, and ask whether fine-tuning is necessarily preferable to training from scratch. We compare five universal MLIP frameworks, MACE-MP-0, SevenNet-0, GRACE-1L-OAM, MatterSim-v1-5M and ORB-v2, across seven chemically diverse systems incorporating rare and reactive events. Fine-tuning on only 10 AIMD-derived configurations is insufficient for the investigated systems; 200 configurations succeed in favorable cases, but the outcome remains strongly system-dependent. By contrast, 2000 AIMD configurations constitute a robust default, yielding low force and energy errors and reproducing the target material-specific observables. Moderately dense sub-sampling of the AIMD trajectory reduces the required trajectory length tenfold with little loss in model quality. Training from scratch on the same datasets is competitive with, and often slightly more accurate than, naive fine-tuning for MACE and SevenNet, whereas GRACE requires more data. The energy profile for a sulfur-vacancy jump in MoS$_2$ reveals that low trajectory-level errors do not guarantee a correct reaction profile, highlighting the need for observable-level validation. Finally, we show that averaging independently trained models improves predictions in scarce-data regimes at no additional first-principles cost. Together, these results provide practical guidelines for converting limited AIMD reference data into reliable material-specific MLIPs for nanosecond-timescale simulations at near-DFT accuracy.
Dyna-Mat-v1.0 shows that end-to-end finite-temperature validation is essential for quantifying the predictive behaviour of foundation MLIPs, and provides a simple, scalable route for assessing them beyond static and harmonic benchmarks relevant to materials design.
Mikołaj J Gawkowski, Nongnuch Artrith, Silvia Bonfanti et al.· 1 citation
Foundation machine-learning interatomic potentials (MLIPs) enable atomistic simulations at substantially lower computational cost than first-principles methods, but their reliability across structural geometries remains insufficiently understood. Here, we construct a density-functional-theory dataset of ZrO2 configurat...
P. Zanineli, B. Focassio, G. R. Schleder· 0 citations
The limits of equivariant MLIPs are examined, and a family of foundation potentials in the NequIP and Allegro equivariant MLIP architectures are presented which achieve leading inference speeds and strong scalability as well as excellent accuracies across a range of community benchmarks.
Seán R. Kavanagh, Chuin Wei Tan, Menghang Wang et al.· 0 citations
Adaptive Multi-Teacher Routing is established as an effective mechanism for converting multiple pretrained uMLIPs into a scalable and reliable data-construction system for high-fidelity uMLIPs.
Mingxiang Luo, Xinnan Mao, Lu Wang et al.· 0 citations
The results show that it is possible to parametrize high-quality reactive MLIPs without the need to select reference data manually and with a limited number of expensive quantum mechanical reference calculations.
J. Steffen· Journal of Chemical Theory a...· 0 citations
This work introduces MLIP Studio, an open and free platform that brings more than 60 universal MLIPs into a unified interactive interface for molecules and materials, and demonstrates that MLIP-based pre-optimization can reduce subsequent DFT optimization effort by ~33$\times$.
Manas Sharma, Sudeep N. Punnathanam, A. Rajan· 1 citation
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.