Adaptive Multi-Teacher Routing is established as an effective mechanism for converting multiple pretrained uMLIPs into a scalable and reliable data-construction system for high-fidelity uMLIPs.
Abstract
Universal machine learning interatomic potentials (uMLIPs) bridge quantum-mechanical accuracy and large-scale molecular dynamics, but the cost of high-accuracy calculations such as r$^2$SCAN limits training to datasets that remain small relative to the open materials space. Strong average benchmark performance also does not guarantee reliable energy--force predictions for every structure. We propose Adaptive Multi-Teacher Routing (ATR), which reformulates high-fidelity data construction as a structure-wise decision problem under uncertainty. Using a small set of real r$^2$SCAN labels, ATR calibrates multiple pretrained uMLIP teachers and combines structural descriptors, teacher identity, and inter-teacher disagreement to estimate the reliability of each structure--teacher pair. It selects high-confidence predictions for pseudo-label generation and rejects structures for which no teacher is sufficiently reliable. With real r$^2$SCAN labels for only 0.2\% of candidate structures, ATR distils 2.89 million traceable r$^2$SCAN-level pseudo-labels for pretraining. On held-out r$^2$SCAN structures and the MP-r$^2$SCAN benchmark, a lightweight CHGNet trained on the ATR-generated dataset consistently outperforms the baseline and non-routed controls. Finite-temperature molecular dynamics further shows that ATR improves dynamical robustness across multiple material systems, maintaining stable trajectories where baseline simulations undergo catastrophic structural collapse. These results establish active rejection as an effective mechanism for converting multiple pretrained uMLIPs into a scalable and reliable data-construction system for high-fidelity uMLIPs.
Pretrained machine-learning interatomic potentials, so-called universal or foundation models offer an appealing starting point for atomistic simulations, but their accuracy for material-specific observables often remains limited without additional reference data (fine-tuning). Here, we systematically quantify how much first-principles data are required to convert universal models into ab initio-accurate material-specific potentials, and ask whether fine-tuning is necessarily preferable to training from scratch. We compare five universal MLIP frameworks, MACE-MP-0, SevenNet-0, GRACE-1L-OAM, MatterSim-v1-5M and ORB-v2, across seven chemically diverse systems incorporating rare and reactive events. Fine-tuning on only 10 AIMD-derived configurations is insufficient for the investigated systems; 200 configurations succeed in favorable cases, but the outcome remains strongly system-dependent. By contrast, 2000 AIMD configurations constitute a robust default, yielding low force and energy errors and reproducing the target material-specific observables. Moderately dense sub-sampling of the AIMD trajectory reduces the required trajectory length tenfold with little loss in model quality. Training from scratch on the same datasets is competitive with, and often slightly more accurate than, naive fine-tuning for MACE and SevenNet, whereas GRACE requires more data. The energy profile for a sulfur-vacancy jump in MoS$_2$ reveals that low trajectory-level errors do not guarantee a correct reaction profile, highlighting the need for observable-level validation. Finally, we show that averaging independently trained models improves predictions in scarce-data regimes at no additional first-principles cost. Together, these results provide practical guidelines for converting limited AIMD reference data into reliable material-specific MLIPs for nanosecond-timescale simulations at near-DFT accuracy.
Foundation machine learning interatomic potentials (MLIPs) deliver near-ab-initio accuracy at a fraction of the computational cost, yet their promise for Metal-organic Frameworks (MOFs) remains largely unrealized as large unit cells make first-principles training data expensive to generate, fine-tuned models are scarce, and experimentally grounded benchmarks are scarcer still. We introduce uMOF, a three-part contribution addressing this gap. First, we release the largest and most accurate density functional theory dataset for MOFs to date, computed at the r$^2$SCAN-D4 level of theory across 85524 configurations spanning 19950 unique frameworks and 79 elements, covering empty and gas-loaded structures, geometry optimizations, equations of state, and finite-temperature molecular dynamics. Second, we release a literature-mined benchmark of 3986 verified property values (3146 experimental) extracted from 626 papers by a seven-stage, checkpointed multi-pass large language model pipeline, linked to more than 650 crystallographic information files. Third, we release two universal MLIPs for MOFs, uMOF-MH and uMOF-POLAR, fine-tuned from two architecturally distinct MACE foundation models on the uMOF dataset. On near-equilibrium, ``Tier-1''properties (bulk modulus, phonon-derived heat capacity) the uMOF models perform comparably to existing foundation and fine-tuned baselines. On harder, dynamics-sensitive properties like gas adsorption enthalpies via Widom insertion and adsorption isotherms, the uMOF models outperform every baseline we test, including MOF-specialized gas-capture models trained on datasets up to three orders of magnitude larger, cutting error by more than 80% to within experimental uncertainty. We trace this advantage to the physical diversity of the training data and to level of theory where a small (1.7%) fraction of MD simulations is decisive for MLIP stability.
T. J. Inizan, Prathami Divakar Kamath, A. Elena et al.· 0 citations
Machine learning interatomic potentials bridge the gap between quantum chemical precision and classical computational speed, enabling molecular dynamics simulations with first-principles accuracy. Their reliability is often improved through active learning, which iteratively expands the training set by identifying uncertain, out-of-distribution configurations. Existing uncertainty-quantification methods often involve a trade-off between computational cost and reliability, and generally cannot account for redundancy as an acquisition batch is assembled. Here, we introduce AdaptNTK, a single-model framework that measures uncertainty as a regularized Mahalanobis distance in empirical neural tangent kernel (NTK) feature space. With the NTK features fixed during acquisition, the uncertainty depends on the acquired configurations but not their reference labels. This allows the uncertainty to be updated recursively after each selection without retraining, reducing redundancy within an acquisition batch. On held-out rMD17 data, AdaptNTK achieves the highest mean correlations with force errors (Spearman 0.68, Pearson 0.71) and matches a three-member ensemble in error retention. In active learning experiments, AdaptNTK achieves the lowest force errors across rMD17 and Transition-1X, with particularly strong performance on transition-state configurations in Transition-1X. AdaptNTK provides a 2.6-fold speedup per Transition-1X cycle relative to the ensemble, providing efficient single-model uncertainty estimation with sequential updates for data-efficient active learning.
Foundation machine-learning interatomic potentials (MLIPs) enable atomistic simulations at substantially lower computational cost than first-principles methods, but their reliability across structural geometries remains insufficiently understood. Here, we construct a density-functional-theory dataset of ZrO2 configurations spanning bulk, slab, particle, neck, and atomically thin wire environments motivated by an experimentally observed ZrO2 desintering process involving neck thinning and atomic wire formation. We first benchmark 26 pretrained MLIPs and observe pronounced geometry-dependent degradation in zero-shot predictions. Without any training, after only reference-energy alignment, the best zero-shot model (ORB-V3) reaches energy and force root-mean-square errors of 6 meV/atom and 197.3 meV/{\AA}, respectively, with the largest force errors in neck and wire configurations. We then compare zero-shot inference, fine-tuning, and training from scratch strategies. Fine-tuning yields lower energy and force errors than training from scratch, while both require comparable wall-clock time. Geometry-specific fine-tuning improves in-domain accuracy but frequently produces negative transfer to other structural classes, whereas mixed-geometry fine-tuning reduces cross-geometry errors. Evaluations of elastic and vibrational properties, surface energies, and neck dynamics further show that rankings based on average energy and force errors do not universally predict property-level behavior. These results demonstrate that geometry-diverse target data and independent physical validations are necessary when adapting foundation MLIPs to low-coordination (ionic) nanostructures.
P. Zanineli, B. Focassio, G. R. Schleder· 0 citations
Machine Learning interatomic potentials (MLIPs) have emerged as powerful tools for molecular dynamics (MD) simulations with their competitive accuracy and computational efficiency. However, MLIPs often exhibit unphysical behavior when encountering configurations that deviate significantly from their training data distribution, leading to simulation instabilities and unreliable dynamics. This limits their reliability for materials simulations. We therefore present a physics-informed pretraining strategy that leverages simple empirical potentials to improve the robustness and stability of MLIPs for MD simulations. We demonstrate this approach through a pretraining-finetuning pipeline where MLIPs are initially pretrained on data labeled with embedded atom model (EAM) potentials and subsequently finetuned on the quantum mechanical ground truth data. Evaluation across three material systems (phosphorus, silica, and a subset of Materials Project) and three representative MLIP architectures (CGCNN, M3GNet, and TorchMD-NET) demonstrates that this physics-informed pretraining consistently improves both prediction accuracy as well as stability in MD compared to the baseline models.
Unknown authors· Journal of Chemical Informat...· 0 citations
The limits of equivariant MLIPs are examined, and a family of foundation potentials in the NequIP and Allegro equivariant MLIP architectures are presented which achieve leading inference speeds and strong scalability as well as excellent accuracies across a range of community benchmarks.
Seán R. Kavanagh, Chuin Wei Tan, Menghang Wang et al.· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.
