Cross-Geometry Transferability Assessment of Universal Machine Learning Interatomic Potentials: From Bulk Materials to Atomic Nanowires

Abstract

Foundation machine-learning interatomic potentials (MLIPs) enable atomistic simulations at substantially lower computational cost than first-principles methods, but their reliability across structural geometries remains insufficiently understood. Here, we construct a density-functional-theory dataset of ZrO2 configurations spanning bulk, slab, particle, neck, and atomically thin wire environments motivated by an experimentally observed ZrO2 desintering process involving neck thinning and atomic wire formation. We first benchmark 26 pretrained MLIPs and observe pronounced geometry-dependent degradation in zero-shot predictions. Without any training, after only reference-energy alignment, the best zero-shot model (ORB-V3) reaches energy and force root-mean-square errors of 6 meV/atom and 197.3 meV/{\AA}, respectively, with the largest force errors in neck and wire configurations. We then compare zero-shot inference, fine-tuning, and training from scratch strategies. Fine-tuning yields lower energy and force errors than training from scratch, while both require comparable wall-clock time. Geometry-specific fine-tuning improves in-domain accuracy but frequently produces negative transfer to other structural classes, whereas mixed-geometry fine-tuning reduces cross-geometry errors. Evaluations of elastic and vibrational properties, surface energies, and neck dynamics further show that rankings based on average energy and force errors do not universally predict property-level behavior. These results demonstrate that geometry-diverse target data and independent physical validations are necessary when adapting foundation MLIPs to low-coordination (ionic) nanostructures.